ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2012 | 59
6. Exceptional income and expenditure (a) Other exceptional net operating expenses The Group has classified the following operating (expenses)/income as exceptional:
Notes Exceptional employment expenses
TRC Management Retention and Incentive Plans Exceptional outsourcing expenses TRC Commutation expenses F&C Partners litigation expenses Exceptional premises expenses
F&C REIT variable non-controlling interests SBP income TRC integration expenses
(i) (ii)
(iii) (iv) (v)
(vi) (vii) (viii)
2012 £m
(8.2) (6.2) (3.3) (1.6) (1.3) (1.3) – –
(21.9)
2011 £m
(8.7) (4.6) (2.7) (5.7) (1.9) –
4.8 (0.2) (19.0)
(i) Exceptional employment expenses During 2011, the Board initiated actions to achieve staff cost savings as a result of the operations outsourcing and the subsequent strategic review process. As a result, some £8.7m of non-recurring redundancy and related staff costs were incurred during that year in order to achieve the targeted level of recurring staff cost savings. During the year ended 31 December 2012 further strategic review initiatives have been implemented to achieve additional staff cost savings, resulting in the recognition of £8.2m of non-recurring employment-related expenses.
The Directors consider these non-recurring employment expenses to be exceptional in nature and have therefore excluded them from the measurement of underlying earnings in each financial year.
(ii) TRC Management Retention and Incentive Plans As a condition of the acquisition of TRC, the Group established a Management Retention Plan (MRP) and Management Incentive Plan (MIP) to retain and incentivise certain TRC personnel. The MRP expense (including NIC) recognised in the Income Statement is £6.2m (2011: £4.7m). No MIP expense was incurred in 2012, as during 2011 it was assessed that none of the performance criteria would be met and, as a result, the cumulative charge previously recognised was reversed and an associated credit of £0.1m was recognised in the 2011 Income Statement. Details of these share-based payment arrangements are given in notes 25(e) and (f).
Given the quantum and nature of these awards, the Directors consider it appropriate to treat the associated net expense as exceptional and exclude them from the measurement of underlying earnings for each financial year.
(iii) Exceptional outsourcing expenses During 2012, a further £2.3m of advisory and consultancy costs were incurred in respect of the continued execution of the outsourcing of certain of the Group’s back and middle office investment operations to State Street. In addition, £1.0m of non-recurring costs were incurred as part of the strategic review activity to rationalise other outsourced activities of the Group.
The Directors consider these project costs to be exceptional in nature and have therefore excluded this expense from the measurement of underlying earnings for each financial year.
(iv) TRC Commutation expenses The Divisional Members of TRC Investment Teams entered into put and call options at the time of the TRC acquisition, which, if exercised, will typically transfer up to 20% of their entitlement to management fee profits to the F&C Group. Under IFRS, the share element of the consideration payable under these Commutation arrangements requires to be accounted for as a share-based payment.
The net expense of £1.6mrecognised in 2012 comprises a £3.5mcharge for the Investment Teams where options have been, or are expected to be exercised, offset by a credit of £1.9mfor those teams where it is no longer expected that F&C would exercise its call option. At 31 December 2012, F&C’s call options are the only remaining options; they become exercisable in September 2013.
Given the capital nature of these arrangements, the Directors consider it appropriate to treat the total Commutation expense as exceptional in nature and exclude it from the measurement of underlying earnings for each financial year.
(v) F&C Partners litigation expenses As highlighted in note 23, the F&C Partners litigation was settled in June 2012, resulting in a net expense of £1.3m being recognised in the Income Statement for the year ended 31 December 2012.
Given the quantum and nature of this expense and the previous costs incurred, the Directors continue to consider it appropriate to treat these costs as exceptional in nature and exclude them from the measurement of underlying earnings in both financial years.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143