Technology 2/4
source desk printers (‘or fabbers’) like the RepRap (developed at Bath University), which launched in 2004. Since then, the market for 3D printers has widened with small-scale commercial, educational and home (‘hobbyist’) use rapidly growing. Over time, news stories have increas- ingly portrayed new applications, from dental implants to customised toys. The Economist even described the growth of 3D printing as the next industrial revo- lution, and back in 2009 wrote: “Home- scale, or personalized manufacturing technologies offer a new approach to designing and making objects that will change the way we design, transport, and consume physical products, unleashing new product ideas”.
A global State of the Industry report, published in 2011, by US 3D printing experts, Terry Wohlers Associates, pre- dicted growth of $3.1bn in 3D printing by 2016; the figures show the UK as the fifth largest country for 3D printer usage. But how do 3D printers work? First,
3D objects are created either by send- ing a digital product design file (more technically known as Computer Aided Design), or by making a scan of an exist- ing 3D object, to a specialised 3D print-
er. Then the 3D printer is loaded up with the raw materials (akin to the ‘ink’ in home inkjet printers), which can either be plastics, wood, metals or food, and the user presses print.
The 3D object, of virtually any shape, then prints, as the raw material is squeezed through the print nozzle and deposited as material droplets, or strands, layer-by- layer, over and over again. The process,
printing will help solve the key sustain- ability issues of the day”. Various reports, such as the University of Lancaster’s Big Innovation Centre 2012 report also voice similar messages. Pro-environment thinking is as follows: conventional methods of industrial man- ufacturing, such as CNC machining, use a subtractive process. This is essentially where products are made by cutting away at blocks of raw materials. As Wohler’s points out, “this can result in around 80% of expensive metal becom- ing scrap”. But with 3D printing, an additive manufacturing process, a mini- mal amount of material is wasted. “Less waste is much better for the environ- ment”, says Wohlers.
known as ‘additive manufacturing’, can take anywhere between several hours to several days. The growth in 3D printing has been accompanied by much debate as to whether the technology is good or bad for the environment. Terry Wohlers, President of US-based
Wohlers Associates, a 3D printing expert, believes “the increasing popularity of 3D
Other general environmental arguments put forward include 3D printers reduc- ing waste because products and parts would only be printed when needed, avoiding waste problems associated with excess or unsold production, including, for example, cost and energy use associ- ated with storage. Further, customised products are expected to be optimised for their target use, suggesting extended product lifetime. On-site production, local to the consumer, has also been sug-
3D objects are created by sending a digital product design file, or by making a scan of an existing 3D object, to a specialised printer which is then loaded up
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65