Production • Processing • Handling
Preventing premature chemical dosing valve failure in subsea tiebacks
Simon Tattersall examines how specialist valve trim technology prolongs valve life and helps to avoid costly unplanned outages in severe service environments.
I
n the designing, operating and maintaining of a subsea tieback, an operator has multiple challenges to consider. Te way they choose to overcome these challenges will determine the system’s reliability and operability, as well as its ongoing profitability. One of the principal challenges in subsea systems is enabling flow assurance through effective hydrate management. To miminise the risks posed by hydrate formation, a continuous MEG injection will be required. Earlier in 2012, Koso Kent Introl (KKI)
were approached by a major oil operator, who required specialist assistance to overcome a hydrate management problem in an existing chemical dosing system within a subsea tieback. Several manifold MEG dosing valves had failed
prematurely within the chemical dosing manifold, and the operator was seeking an ongoing solution that would eliminate the risk of this occurring elsewhere in the system in the future. KKI engineers were briefed about the problem: prior to the tieback being implemented, pressures in the pipeline had been relatively low (60 barg inlet pressure, with only a modest drop to 30 barg outlet pressure). Te dosing valves had therefore been able to cope with the flow. With the introduction of a new, higher pressure well tieback to the field later in its life, inlet pressure had subsequently increased
to 350barg. Te resultant high velocities and energy levels arising from this greatly increased pressure drop had caused failures in the existing single stage valves well before the end of the commissioning period. Sand erosion was also a major problem, known to be contributing to the valves’ poor performance. Te failure of the valves was causing costly, unacceptable interruptions to production in the field. Te valve the KKI subsea engineering team
proposed incorporated a multi-spline trim, with the flow sleeve and plug constructed as an insertable cartridge, allowing multiple stages of pressure drop to ensure that cavitation would not occur throughout the known flow range. Te multi-spline trim option would be able to achieve the required rangeability of 200 to 1, due to the very precise fit of the plug within the seat.
Te other major consideration would be material selection. A range of scenarios were modelled, considering the effects of pressure drop for different materials at every stage of let-down, and determining long-term erosion rates for each Guided by the KKI team, the operator selected
the Solid tungsten carbide option, and valve production is currently underway at Kent Introl’s facility in Brighouse, Yorkshire. ●
Enter 62 or ✔ at
www.engineerlive.com/iog
Simon Tattersall is with Koso Kent Introl Ltd, Brighouse, West Yorkshire, UK.
www.kentintrol.com
Fig. 1. Velocity Control Principle - existing valve design. 62
www.engineerlive.com
Fig 2. Velocity Control Principle – proposed valve design.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74