This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Investing in LNG Growth


The global LNG market is entering a period of rapid expansion. This growth is the result of a structural shift towards natural gas as a cleaner fuel and an increase in gas import dependence in Europe and Asia. At the same time, the volume of global liquefaction capacity is set to double over the next decade, requiring an estimated $1 trillion of new investment.


By David Stokes & Olly Spinks


THE LNG MARKET has traditionally been dominated by long term oil-indexed contracts with fixed destination clauses. While long term contracts remain a feature of the market, the physical and contractual flexibility of LNG is increasing. Pronounced inter-regional price differentials and improvements in gas hub liquidity have been a catalyst for contract re-negotiation, secondary trading and the diversion of cargoes.


market price signals. As a result, there is typically an important relationship between the value of an individual LNG asset investment and its interaction with the surrounding portfolio.


The LNG Market in Perspective The global LNG market is still in a stage of


relative infancy. Only a small portion of global gas consumption is currently satisfied by LNG (around


Figure 1: Summary of the Global Gas Market


Sources: BP Statistical Review of World Energy, 2012; Timera Energy The evolution of the LNG market presents some


compelling investment opportunities but also some specific challenges. The LNG supply chain is inherently more complex and interdependent than that for pipeline gas. Value across the supply chain is driven by the interaction between bespoke supply contract structures, underlying asset flexibility and


10% as illustrated in Figure 1). Only a relatively small volume of LNG has the contractual flexibility for diversion in response to price dynamics. Current constraints around global LNG flexibility are reflected in the regional price divergence across Asia (tight market post Fukushima), Europe (broadly tracking oil-indexed contract supply) and


December 2012 69


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96