This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Tax Avoidance


UK corporation tax. Most multi-national businesses manage their global tax footprint by adopting specific transfer pricing policies in respect of intercompany financing, licensing, purchasing and so on. The cornerstone to the transfer pricing rules is the "arm's length principle" for the valuation, for


accounting rules might be changed to accommodate their requirements or for that matter explain what is “fair”.


Indeed, the sole focus on corporation tax hides the true picture of a company’s UK tax footprint. A statement issued by Starbucks on


Milestone is a boutique international tax practice established in Mayfair, London. The team


comprises young, dynamic lawyers who have specialised in international tax throughout their careers. They specialise in International Corporate Transactions, International Investment Funds, Structure Finance, International Real Estate and Private Clients.


Starbucks reported a loss of almost £33 million in the year to 2 October 2011 and consequently has not paid any UK corporation tax.


Miles Dean is a founder of Milestone International Tax Partners, having started his career


tax purposes, of cross-border transactions between associated enterprises. The internationally recognised and accepted standard for transfer pricing and the methodologies to be used in specific situations is provided by the OECD. Unfortunately, politicians and the press do not seem to appreciate that the UK is an OECD Member and has signed up to the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines.


But, while aggressive transfer pricing might result in “profit shifting”, tax will generally be paid somewhere and to this end it is not surprising that Starbucks’ global effective tax rate is 31.1%. Compare this to Costa’s effective tax rate of 26.4% and the conclusion must be that Starbucks is not engaged in tax avoidance as reported. Those that call for Starbucks and their like to pay their “fair share” very rarely suggest how the tax and


16 October 2012 puts this into context. Over the past three years, Starbucks has paid £160mn in business rates, national insurance and VAT.


So, let’s return to the question – is all this tax avoidance? The simple answer seems to be ‘no’ despite the soap-box parroting of several MPs. The current tax legislation allows a business to reflect the ‘true’ cost of its operations in its tax accounts. While a multi-national business may have additional scope to manage its tax footprint, this article highlights that on a global effective tax rate basis, all of these business pay close (if not more) than the statutory corporate rate. It’s relevant that this figure does not account for other tax costs such as national insurance or VAT. Seen in this light, arguing that these businesses haven’t paid their ‘fair’ share seems hard to support.


in international tax in 1994. He is the co-author of International Tax Systems and Planning Techniques (Sweet & Maxwell) and The Principles of International Tax Planning (Corpus), as well as numerous academic articles. Miles has a varied client base ranging from owner-managed businesses to international investment funds and real estate businesses. Miles has recently advised on a number of high-profile cross-border infrastructure and real estate transactions. Miles specialises in finding bespoke, commercially workable solutions that create significant tax benefits for individual and corporate clients.


Sally Brown is International Tax Associate at Milestone International Tax Partners


Sally Brown has recently joined Milestone. She is a newly-qualified solicitor in England and Wales and completed her training contract at a City law firm where she did seats in Corporate, Tax, Employment and Real Estate. Sally was awarded the Pump Court Tax Chambers Tax Prize for the highest grade in tax law at King’s College London in 2008.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134