This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
EXPENSE MANAGEMENT


EXPENSE MANAGEMENT UNWRAPPED


What are the most important factors in running an effective expense management programme? Mark Frary asks the travel buyers


first time, Buying Business T


has carried out a detailed survey among travel buyers about the expense management systems they use.


T


AUTOMATIC OR MANUAL? Expense management systems are reasonably prevalent among the survey respondents, with more than two-thirds saying they use an automated system as opposed to a paper or spreadsheet-based solution. Despite the hype surrounding the use of such automated systems, more than a quarter of those travel buyers and expense managers answering the survey said they were still using Microsoft Excel or a similar spreadsheet to handle expense claims. Of those companies that are using


automated systems, Concur was the most widely employed, with just under half of those respondents (47.4 per cent) saying they were using it. WebExpenses was the second most widely utilised system, with 15.8 per cent of those answering the survey saying they have adopted it. As might be expected, the


expense management tools used by organisations in our survey are generally tightly linked to wider financial systems, such as SAP


30 Buying Business Travel 2012


his year’s corporate card and expense management supplement is setting a precedent – for the ravel


and Oracle. Almost nine out of 10 respondents (89.5 per cent) said their expense tool was integrated into their organisations’ financial systems. The survey also asked respondents which particular financial systems they used. SAP was cited by half of the organisations polled, with Oracle in second place (28.6 per cent) and Microsoft Dynamics (14.3 per cent) trailing in third place.


INTEGRATION Much has been made in recent years of the integration of travel booking and expense systems, but does the reality bear out the shiny vision of the future promoted by system providers? Just fewer than two-thirds of


buyers and managers questioned in the survey said there was no integration between the two systems within their organisations. That a third did have integrated systems is likely to be partly due to the popularity of Concur, which offers an end-to-end solution.


COSTS AND COMPLIANCE We asked our buyers their main reason for using an expense management system, and it comes as no surprise that most organisations wanted to use it to monitor compliance with their policies. The second most important reason cited was to reduce the cost of processing claims, while


Buying Business Travel’s survey was carried out online in March and April 2012; 98 buyers from a range of sectors and organisations responded (see below).


INDUSTRY SECTOR 10% 7% 7% 17% 20% 10% 29%


Manufacturing, engineering and aerospace


Finance/insurance Public sector/charity/education Pharmaceuticals


Media/publishing Technology/telecommunications Other


SIZE OF ORGANISATION 6% 15% 20% 59%


1 to 250 251 to 1,000 1,001 to 2,500


More than 2,500


ORGANISATION TURNOVER 0%


6%


15% 6%


61% 9% 3%


Less than £1m £1m to £10m £10m to £25m


£25m to £100m £50m to £100m


More than £250m £100m to £250m


SIZE OF ORGANISATION’S T&E BUDGET 3% 9% 6% 6% 12% 9% 14% 41%


Less than £100,000 £1m to £2.5m


£100,001 to £1m


£2.5m to £5m £5m to £10m £10m to £25m £25m to £50m More than £50m


In association with


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156