TH E
N
A
N
D
2 The Jewish Herald • Friday, March 22, 2013 3 N
O W
Nixon Mocked Democrats For Their Jerusalem Position W
The U.S., during administrations of both parties, has refused to recognize any nation’s sovereignty over Jerusalem since Israel’s creation in 1948 Frederic J. Frommer
ASHINGTON — Last year, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney attacked the Democratic
convention platform for its “shameful” decision to omit a reference to Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. But in a sign of how U.S. politics have changed in 40 years, President Richard Nixon complained in 1972 of the Democrats’ “dishonest” platform language declaring the city Israel’s capital. Nixon’s national security adviser, Henry Kissing-
er, agreed with his condemnation during a previous- ly unreported taped conversation from June 29, 1972. “To make Jerusalem the capital of Israel is not the platform of a major American national party,” Henry Kissinger told Nixon. “That is what I find so revolt- ing here.” The tape is one of a collection housed at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center. On Wednesday, Barack Obama arrived in Israel for
his first visit there as president — about six months after telling Democratic Party officials to reinstate language from previous convention platforms stat- ing Jerusalem is the Israeli capital. “It is wonderful to be back in Jerusalem, the eter-
nal city,” Obama said at an appearance with Israeli President Shimon Peres at Peres’ home in Jerusalem Wednesday, following a meeting between the two men. But on Tuesday in Washington, Obama’s adminis-
tration argued in a federal appellate court that a law allowing Americans born in Jerusalem to have their place of birth listed on their U.S. passports as Israel infringed on the president’s foreign-policy powers. The United States, during administrations of both political parties, has refused to recognize any nation’s sover- eignty over Jerusalem since Israel’s creation in 1948. The Republicans added language to their platform in
Richard Nixon
1996 declaring Jerusalem the capital of Israel, and the party has included similar language ever since. Dem- ocrats have kept it in their platform for every election since 1972 except for 1988, according to a review of pres- idential platforms compiled by the American Presidency Project at the University of California, Santa Barbara. For decades, Republican and Democratic admin-
istrations alike have said it is up to the Israelis and Palestinians to settle Jerusalem’s final status — es- sentially a neutral position amid rivaling territorial claims. Both sides consider the city their capital, and
its status has long been among the thorniest issues in Mideast peace talks. The 1972 chat begins with Kissinger asking Nixon
if he’d read the Democrats’ foreign-policy platform. “I didn’t want to lose my breakfast, so I didn’t both-
er,” Nixon replied. After relating the Democrats’ policies on the Vietnam
War, Kissinger said, “Then all-out on Israel, I mean, in a really nauseating way . . . in a degree of detail, you know, Jerusalem should be the capital, direct negoti- ations between the parties. Nauseating detail. “I mean, this is a disgrace. This is written by a bunch
of cynical amateurs,” added Kissinger, who is Jewish. Nixon responded: “To be all-out on Israel — isn’t that
something, though? That is, that is so dishonest.” The Republican president suggested that Demo-
cratic military cuts would leave Israel vulnerable to military aggression. Israel had fought a war against its Arab neighbors five years earlier. “You can be for Jerusalem being the capital, and if
you’re got a $35 billion defense cut, you ain’t going to be able to — there isn’t going to be anything to be capital of,” said Nixon, who was considered a friend of Israel de- spite making many antiSemitic comments in private. “Well it shows you what we’re — we contend with.
And it also shows the necessity for us to be in good shape. Because these people are so revolting that they have to be smashed,” Nixon said. “They must be smashed,” Kissinger added. Nixon went on: “But I don’t, I don’t mean just beat
them. It’s good to beat them. But I mean smashed. They must be, they must be, disgraced, driven right out of public life.” The conversation occurred two years before the Wa-
tergate scandal would drive Nixon from office in dis- grace.
o
ISRAEL BONDS THIS PASSOVER From Exodus to Innovation
SINAI DESERT
TEL AVIV FINALIST FOR
MOST INNOVATIVE CITY ON THE PLANET*
*WSJ City of the Year sponsored by Citi® Invest In Israel Bonds ·
israelbonds.com
Development Corporation for Israel/Israel Bonds 575 Lexington Avenue · New York, NY 10022 888.764.2631 ·
ncc@israelbonds.com
This is not an offering, which can be made only by prospectus. Read the prospectus carefully before investing to fully evaluate the risks associated with investing in Israel bonds. Member FINRA Photos: ©
iStockphoto.com/ratluk; ©
iStockphoto.com/slidezero_com
Photo Cliff1066
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42