This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
IN THE SPOTLIGHT


IN THE SPOTLIGHT


HOW ADAMS & ADAMS IS TAKING ON THE WORLD


With the takeover of Bowman Gilfi llan’s IP practice on March 1, South African fi rm Adams & Adams became the largest intellectual property outfi t in Africa. WIPR goes behind the scenes.


Financial crisis? What fi nancial crisis? While many law fi rms have struggled in the face of rising costs and falling revenues, some high-performers in Africa have benefi ted from increased opportunity and investment across the continent which, coupled with more robust IP protection, has led to a comparative boom in work.


Adams & Adams is South Africa’s largest IP fi rm and, with its takeover of Bowman Gilfi llan’s IP practice, now boasts 85 IP attorneys. Alongside this numerical expansion, the fi rm has also branched out geographically, now also opening offi ces in Tanzania and Burundi to signal its continental ambitions.


Dario Tanziani (above right), chair of Adams & Adams, says the merger with Bowman Gilfi llan’s IP practice “makes perfect sense” for both parties.


“T e IP industry is becoming very competitive in light of the economic circumstances,” he says. “One way to increase our market share is to take on a good practice. It means we can achieve economies of scale and boost our market share and our bottom line.”


It’s not just the fi rm that stands to benefi t from the merger. “From the clients’ perspective,” says Tanziani, “they will be housed in the Adams & Adams infrastructure and also have the opportunity to service Bowman’s blue chip client base.”


Eugene Honey was chair of Bowman Gilfi llan’s IP practice prior to the move. He says the move is “a win all round for clients, staff , senior associates, associates and support staff . T ere are massive synergies and economies of scale.”


“BOWMAN GILFILLAN HAS AN EXISTING AFRICA PRACTICE, AND ADAMS & ADAMS HAS A WIDE NETWORK OF ASSOCIATES IN AFRICA AND BEYOND WITH WHICH IT WORKS CLOSELY ON NON- SOUTH AFRICAN MATTERS.”


World Intellectual Property Review March/April 2012 21


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76