This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
CITI


MAKING THE RIGHT COLLATERAL CHOICE


Douglas Tienken, director, insurance trust sales, and Vivek Thakur, director, insurance trust product management, at Citi’s Global Transaction Services, explain the key factors captives must examine when making the choice between letters of credit and trusts.


reinsurance agreement. While LoCs have long-standing and numerous merits, trusts offer signifi cant attractions too.


I


For years, since their introduction in the US in the 1960s as a substitute for escrow facilities, LoCs have been the most popular solution used by captive insurers. Since then, captive insurance has undergone a revolution: there are now thousands of captives writing business worldwide using fronting companies.


Although each jurisdiction has unique requirements, the principle that captives are thinly capitalised (and therefore require security for both regulatory and credit reasons) is universal, and LoCs have, consequently, remained the dominant product.


According to Marsh’s 2010 Global Captive Benchmarking Report, which analysed 750 single-parent captives in its client group, LoCs represent 59 percent of all collateral instruments used, compared with 19 percent employing insurance trusts, 19 percent escrow facilities and 3 percent parental guarantees.


ndustry discussions on the most appropriate form of insurance collateral ebb and fl ow as we move through the cycle, but in reality both letters of credit (LoCs) and trusts are important instruments


for securing a captive’s obligations under


Citi’s own experience shows that in the US, up to 80 percent of collateralisation uses LoCs and around 20 percent insurance trusts, but does this always represent the best choice of structure?


a


How LoCs and trusts differ While LoCs are the most signifi cant instrument used by captive insurers for collateralisation, trusts are of growing importance. Trusts perform the same role in securing a captive insurer’s reinsurance obligations, but work in a somewhat different way. Instead of an applicant for a LoC, the captive is called the grantor of the trust. The fronting company is the benefi ciary of both products, and a bank sits in the middle. However, there are further differences between the products that need to be considered.


One of the most important differences between a LoC and a trust is the role of the bank. Under a LoC, the bank issues LoCs in favour of the benefi ciary and acts as a guarantor. With a trust, the bank is a trustee rather than a guarantor.


One of the reasons for the growth in the use of trusts by captive insurers is that LoCs are a credit product and therefore carry regulatory capital costs—a 100 percent capital charge—for banks. This has prompted


CICA | Forty years of captive leadership 83


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132