This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
MUNICH RE


“Due to the fact that a captive has to compete for scarce resources in a value-optimising corporate environment, it makes sense to consider the CFO’s perspective as a necessary condition which has to be fulfilled.”


financial performance should therefore begin with an analysis of the economic assessment process itself. A captive is an insurance entity, so it will always be difficult to measure and compare its performance with non-insurance projects and ventures competing for internal resources. Companies should ensure that financial assessments recognise all the benefits a captive creates, such as the potential difference between market premium rates and captive rates. At the same time, firms need to ensure that an adequate hurdle rate is used for measuring value creation. In many cases, the standard WACC of the parent company is not the most appropriate hurdle rate.


Another option is to increase operational excellence by running the captive as if it were an insurance company under competitive market conditions. This would mean implementing risk-based steering methods as well as asset-liability-management (ALM). Experience shows that implementing ALM, an area that captives


have not traditionally focused on in the past, can improve financial performance and value creation considerably.


Increasing the value for the internal clients The internal client’s perspective can be a very interesting one, as it has the potential to build up widespread support for the captive throughout the company. The first step regarding increasing value for internal clients should therefore be the capture of detailed knowledge of the needs of all existing and potential internal clients. A captive can increase value by providing specific insurance solutions to SBUs that might not be available elsewhere in the market.


The range and satisfaction of internal clients can also be increased by analysing current insurance market conditions and potential shortcomings which might head off future dissatisfaction among SBUs.


68 CICA | Forty years of captive leadership


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132