CONFERENCE CALL
CIPA CONGRESS LANCASTER LONDON HOTEL, LONDON
The 16th Annual CIPA Congress boasted an impressive programme of important speakers, and witnessed lively debate on patent developments in the UK and further afi eld.
Roya Ghafele, director of Oxfi rst Ltd and fellow of the Said Business School at Oxford University, put the challenges facing patent offi ces especially well: “Patent offi ces, as key players in a working patent system, need to adapt to massive increases in demand and accept the changing nature of scientifi c expertise as a result of new technologies.” In the context of her speech, on crowdsourcing
prior art search on the Internet, this rings true, but the general sentiment has wider applications across the intellectual property industry.
Many of the presentations at the CIPA Congress relied, either implicitly or explicitly, on a sense of what is possible with new technologies and their attendant ways of thinking. Everything from anti- counterfeiting eff orts to the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) live or die on the quality of the technology that is used to implement them, and more importantly, on the ability of the participants to best harness that technology. Alison Brimelow CBE, chair of the Intellectual Property Institute at Queen Mary’s University and a former president of the European Patent Offi ce, was particularly illuminating and frank on the strengths and fl aws of PPH.
Alongside matters of international agreements and co-operation, there is still and will remain a place for something a little more solid, a little more close to home. In a fascinating presentation,
HHJ Colin Birss QC, who heads up the Patents County Court, explained the recent success of that body and exhibited a pragmatic approach to case management and workload that was welcomed by delegates.
Other keynote speakers included Baroness Wilcox, the UK IP minister, and Olivér Várhelyi, of the European Commission’s DG Markt, who spoke about patent reform in the EU and the continuing eff orts to get some kind of agreement between member states, even if it can’t include everybody.
Alongside this, further panels discussed the relationship between industry and IP professionals, how to navigate intellectual property issues when doing business deals, the changing landscape for small and medium sized enterprises, and the now- traditional analysis of the last year’s hot topics. T is last took in US patent reform, key cases in the European courts, and the imminent revision of European Patent Offi ce guidelines. ■
www.worldipreview.com
World Intellectual Property Review November/December 2011
11
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100