This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
President Goodluck Jonathan, standing next to the Guards Brigade Commander, waves to the crowds after his inauguration in May


From the historical point of view, the cantons came first. ”Thus the Swiss state was not artificially decentralised, but built


up from below [like their watches!]. In the USA, the emphasis lies on the decentralisation of the public power, in Switzerland it is rather on the independence of the canton. “Since finally, the racial, linguistic, religious and other


differences within the people are not, as in America, the product of immigration, and largely coincide with cantonal [ethnic] frontiers, there is no feeling of need for assimilation. On the contrary, a higher interest demands that each part of the country should preserve its individuality. In the National Council, as also, for that matter, in the Council of States, every member can speak in his mother tongue.” Hans Huber rounds up his analysis of the workings of the Swiss democratic model with this: “Democracy [in Switzerland] is less of an outward show and more of a mental activity.” This brings me back nicely to the Nigerian watchmaker. I accept


that it may not be possible in the lifetime of my reader for the political class to get Nigeria to the point of manufacturing watches


like the Swiss, but is it really too much to ask for them to organise our political space on the Swiss model? Is it not time for them to move from wearing watches on their


wrists to making the observance of time a mental activity so as to appreciate that after 50 years of independence, we are back almost where we started, with the South West, the core North, and the South East (now with the Middle Belt) under separate political parties? Is it not time for us to move beyond the outward show of democracy, with elections and all their razzmatazz, to making democracy a mental activity by way of a genuine federal arrangement that allows the people in each component part to run according to their own value systems and priorities, whether Boko is Haram or not? The Federalists are clear in their answers to these questions as


they have always been but, as the Boko Haram menace grows daily, the clock is ticking for the Unitarists. Do I hear anything more than Kashimawo? (Dele Ogun is the author of The Law, the Lawyers and the Lawless.)


New African | October 2011 | 77


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100