This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 – Global 500 Report


of responding companies in the CDLI as it only represents 5% of the responding population but 17% of the CDLI. The UK and Switzerland are also high performing countries. Sixteen countries had companies in the CDLI this year which is the same as in 2010. Notable absentees in 2011 include China, India and Russia.


CDLI and Shareholder Value


The Global 500 companies reported that climate change may have a range of financial impacts on them and consequently on investors. The main drivers reported for such impacts are varied but include:


• Regulation e.g. carbon prices set through emissions trading schemes (ETS) as seen in Europe, or through a tax as is currently proposed in Australia


urn % (US$)


• The potential impact of climate change on supply chains


• Changing consumer preferences


• The potential for an increase in the frequency of extreme weather events


Investors value the CDP responses because they clearly disclose the potential investment implications climate change may have on any given business.


Companies included in the CDLI in 2011 have a higher total return from January 2005 to May 2011 than Global 500 companies, outperforming them by a total of 40 percentage points over the six year period.


When analyzing companies included in the CDLI for the last three consecutive years, an even stronger result is revealed: they outperformed the Global 500 by over 60 percentage points over the same period. This indicates that companies which are consistently successful at measuring, managing and reporting on climate change demonstrate higher financial performance.


Figure 21: Total return % (US$) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0


-20 -40


It is noted that the relationship between strong carbon disclosure scores and total return has not been fully explored. The relationship between total return and carbon disclosure does not necessarily indicate that one causes the other; both will be influenced by a range of factors. These may include the quality of the companies’ management or the companies’ broader approach to identifying and capitalizing on opportunities or managing risks. These findings would benefit from further analysis by the investment community.


It is notable that the period when CDLI companies’ total return falls below Global 500 companies’ total return is in late 2008, during the economic downturn. Although total return fell in all sectors, the downturn particularly affected the Financials sector which makes up the highest proportion of the CDLI.


Companies included in the CDLI for three consecutive years (2009-2011) CDLI 2011


Global 500 2011 Source: Bloomberg 28


Total return % (US$) Jan 05 Jul 05 Jan 06 Jul 06 Jan 07 Jul 07 Jan 08 Jul 08 Jan 09 Jul 09 Jan 10 Jul 10 Jan 11


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80