HYDRONICS
FROM THE FIELD Commercial radiant
BY DAN FOLEY CONTRIBUTING WRITER
renovate a 19th century brick schoolhouse that had been abandoned and had become dilapidated after many years. He was going to convert the building into seven condominiums with an underground parking garage, as well as put up six rowhouses that would blend in with the period architecture of the neighborhood. The Wormley School, a brick schoolhouse built in 1885, presented unique challenges. The outside of the structure could not be altered, due to the building’s location in the historic Georgetown district of Washington, D.C. In order to maintain the architectural integrity, the single-pane glazed windows had to stay. We worked with the developer, Encore Development,
S 30
located in Bethesda, Md., Architect Cunningham + Quill, based in Georgetown and mechanical engineer Summit Engineering, based in Arlington, Va., to design a first class mechanical system within the constraints of the 100-plus- year-old building. Developer Steve Kay of Encore Development says, “I tasked Foley Mechanical and Summit Engineering with designing a best-in-class mechanical system in terms of comfort, efficiency and reliability. This
everal years ago, I was asked by a developer to help design the ultimate comfort system for a high-end condominium project. The developer was going to
heat this structure with forced air. We ran into a slight problem with the structural engineer: He did not want the radiant tubing in the 6" structural slab. His contention was that the radiant tubing would compromise the integrity of the slab. I did not agree with this, as we had installed many radiant systems in structural slabs. Rather than battle with the structural engineer, we developed an alternate plan. Instead, we had a layer of 2" extruded polystyrene insulation installed on top of the structural slab. A 2" capping slab was poured with our radiant tubing embedded in that layer. As the ceilings were 12–14 ft. tall, we had the luxury of the additional 4" required by this installation method. In hindsight, this may have been the best outcome, as we
installed the tubing late in the construction process. The tubing was installed long after the plumber, electrician, tel- com, alarm contractor and general contractor had completed their rough-ins and floor penetrations. This minimized the number of tubing punctures and repairs. The radiant tubing was only hit once, which was amazing for a project this size. In addition, the 2" capping slab allowed for quicker response time on a heat demand. One downside was the time frame allotted for installing
the radiant tubing. No other subs could work in the areas where we were installing it. In addition, the capping slab required a pump truck when it was poured, which required closing one lane of Prospect Street, a busy Georgetown thoroughfare. We had to get the tube down quickly and get it covered in 2" of concrete. In order to meet this schedule, I put a crew of nine on the
job; we were able to lay approximately 15,000 lineal feet of ½" Uponor Wirsbo PEX in a two-day period. We split up and were working on three floors simultaneously. Of most help was a tie tool I first saw at ISH-Frankfurt the year before. This tool automated the task of tying the tube to the re-bar or steel wire mesh. Previously, we had to twist the
“squiggies” using a hand tool. This was fine for small jobs but was too slow and tedious for a large project like this. After several hours of twisting the ties, your wrist was ready to give out. Enter the Max tie tool. It was originally designed for rod
Dan Foley of Foley Mechanical stands in the mechanical room in the newly renovated Wormley School building.
system had to meet the expectations of our demanding clientele. The system Foley installed exceeded these criteria.” As this was a commercial project, detailed shop drawings
were required. I had met Abe Stallcup, principal at Monterey Energy Group at a previous RPA function. I contacted Abe about doing these drawings, and he agreed. I spent many hours with Abe on countless phone calls and emails to develop the drawings. The results were outstanding. The shop drawings allowed my crew, as well as the architect, GC and other trades to know exactly where our tubing, piping and equipment should be installed well in advance of the actual work. It is far easier to “fix” problems on paper rather than on the jobsite. We decided early on that radiant floor heat would be
ideal, due to the poured concrete construction and large eight-foot tall single-pane windows. It would be difficult to
busters tying steel re-bar on concrete jobs. By loosening the adjustable tension and using a softer plastic-coated aluminum tie wire, it was easily modified for tying radiant tubing to the mesh. It will wrap, twist and cut the wire in about a second. This is exactly what I needed, and we used three of these tools on the project. Yes, these tools are expensive (around $2,200 in 2009),
but labor is my largest expense. I will readily invest in tools that will reduce man hours as well as wear and tear on bodies. Most importantly, it kept us on a very tight schedule and allowed concrete to be poured as planned. As this entailed scheduling a street closure, we had no choice. We either had to deliver, or we would be removed from the job. I am happy to report that my crew delivered in spades. Radiant floor heat serves as the primary heat source in
the seven condominiums. Each one is sub-divided into multiple zones using manifold tel-stats. We incorporate second stage hot deck coils on the air handlers. This also
e Turn to FOLEY on p 32
phc august 2011
www.phcnews.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104