This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Leukemia & Lymphoma, June 2011; 52(S2): 11–13


Diagnosis of hairy cell leukemia by flow cytometry


MARYALICE STETLER-STEVENSON & PRASHANT R. TEMBHARE Flow Cytometry Unit, Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA


Abstract Flow cytometric immunophenotpying (FCI) is a vital tool in the diagnosis of hairy cell leukemia (HCL). HCL has a distinctive immunophenotype based upon staining with antibodies to CD5 (negative), CD10 (negative), CD23 (negative), CD20 (abnormally bright), CD22 (abnormally bright), CD11c (abnormally bright), CD25 (abnormally bright), CD103 (positive), and CD123 (positive). Due to this unique immunophenotype, FCI can differentiate malignant hairy cells from normal B-cells and other lymphoproliferative disorders, especially the morphologically similar hairy cell leukemia variant and splenic lymphoma with villous lymphocytes. FCI is extremely sensitive in the detection of minimal disease and is useful in monitoring response to therapy.


Keywords: flow cytometry, hairy cell leukemia, CD103, CD11c, CD123


Flow cytometric immunophenotpying (FCI) pro- vides enhanced sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of hairy cell leukemia (HCL). Historically, diagnosis was based on evaluation of bone marrow and peripheral blood for hairy cells and demonstra- tion of tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining to confirm the diagnosis. However, bone marrow aspiration is frequently unsuccessful in these patients and the biopsy specimen may be insufficient for a definitive diagnosis. Moreover, peripheral blood involvement often is minimal, making identification of hairy cells by light microscopic examination difficult. In addition, hairy cell leukemia is difficult to distinguish from splenic lymphoma with villous lymphocytes (SLVL) by morphologic examination alone, and TRAP staining can be negative in HCL and positive in other lymphoproliferative disorders [1,2]. Since HCL has a distinctive flow cytometric immunophenotypic profile that is different from normal B-cells and other lymphoproliferative dis- orders, FCI can provide a definitive diagnosis of this disease. Furthermore, due to the ability to rapidly evaluate large numbers of cells, FCI can detect


extremely low numbers of HCL cells and is more sensitive than standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) B-cell clonality studies in detecting low-level HCL [3]. Although hairy cell leukemia variant (HCLv) has similar splenic and bone marrow pathological features to that of classical HCL, it has a markedly different clinical course, response to treatment, and immunophenotype. Because of the different outcomes of classical HCL and HCLv, a distinction between the two diseases becomes a relevant clinical issue, and FCI is useful in making the diagnosis [4]. Classical HCL has a diagnostic immunophenotype


that is readily identifiable by FCI. Hairy cells are monoclonal with surface light chain restriction. In contrast to the majority of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders, lambda light chain restriction is highly prevalent, with either a predominance of lambda or equal incidence of kappa and lambda restriction [1,5]. The hairy cells characteristically express CD19, CD20, CD22, CD79b, FMC7, CD11c, CD25, CD103, and CD123 but are negative for CD5, CD10 (positive in 5–14% of cases) and CD23


Correspondence: Dr. Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson, NIH, NCI, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. E-mail: stetler@mail.nih.gov


ISSN 1042-8194 print/ISSN 1029-2403 online  2011 Informa UK, Ltd. DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2011.570820


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122