This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Microenvironment in HCL 95


Figure 1. Expression of chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules on HCL cells. These overlay histograms depict fluorescence intensities of CD19/CD11c/CD103-positive, CD19- gated HCL cells, stained with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) toward the antigens that are displayed above or below each of the histograms. The light gray histograms depict the fluorescence intensities of HCs stained with respective isotype control mAbs for comparison with the specific mAbs (dark gray). HCL cells express CXCR4, CD49d, CD44, and CD40, but are negative for CXCR3 and CXCR5.


CD106) and fibronectin (FN) on stromal and endothelial cells, and as part of the extracellular matrix [13–15] (Figure 2). aMb2 (CD11b), aXb2 (CD11c), and aEb7 (CD103) are also expressed on HCL cells and are important for immunophenotyp- ing of HCL (CD11c, CD103), but their function is less defined. The aVb3 integrin functions as a receptor for vitronectin (VN) and platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1; CD31) and is important in HC motility. CD44 is expressed on HCs and functions as a receptor for hyaluronan [16]. HCs binding to hyaluronan via CD44 enhance autocrine production of FN and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) [17], which, along with HC- derived transforming growth factor-b1 (TGF-b1) [18] is involved in the development of the marrow fibrosis typically seen in HCL. Functionally, CXCR4 and VLA-4 are critical for


migration, adhesion, and retention of normal hema- topoietic progenitors within the marrow [19]. Neo- plastic B cells utilize these molecules to access and parasitize within protective marrow niches that normally are occupied by hematopoietic progenitors [20]. Marrow stromal cells (MSCs) constitutively express the ligands for CXCR4 and VLA-4 (CXCL12, and VCAM1 and FN, respectively; Figure 2), and contact between MSCs and malignant B cells induces cell adhesion-mediated drug resis- tance (CAM-DR), a primary drug resistance me- chanism that may account for minimal residual disease after conventional therapies. Given the high


Figure 2. Cellular and molecular interactions between HCL cells and their microenvironment. HCL cells express CXCR4 chemo- kine receptors and adhesion molecules for adhesion to MSCs, endothelial cells, and extracellular matrix. These pathways are critical for homing and retention within the marrow and possibly also the spleen. In these tissues, HCL cells can also interact with other accessory cells, such as T cells, and may become activated via the BCR. It is currently unknown whether BCR-related kinases (Syk, Btk, PI3K) play a role in BCR signaling in HCL; however, these kinases and CXCR4 are currently targeted in first clinical trials in patients with other mature B-cell malignancies. Cross-talk between HCL cells and their microenvironment leads to activation of downstream pathways in HCs, such as mitogen activated protein (MAP) kinases and the nuclear factor kB (NFkB) pathway.


affinity of HCL cells for homing and retention within the marrow, and the high expression of CXCR4 and VLA-4 integrins on HCL cells, we speculate that these molecules induce HC adhesion to MSCs and thereby retention and protection of HCs in the marrow. Ongoing functional in vitro studies will determine the relevance of CXCR4 and VLA-4 for MSC adhesion and drug resistance in HCL.


Importance of B cell antigen receptor in hairy cell leukemia microenvironment


The very raison d’e ˆtre of mature B-cells is their


antigen (Ag) receptor. It follows that in mature B-cell malignancies the concept of the microenvironment as a regulator of malignant B-cell growth is tightly linked to the possible role of Ag stimulation [21]. Chronic B cell antigen receptor (BCR) stimulation by latent microbial or auto-Ag can trigger the development and expansion of malignant B-cells. The majority of HCL cases display mutated im- munoglobulin variable region genes (M-HCL) [22] and a restricted set of BCR with immunoglobulin (Ig) heavy chain variable (V) gene sequences that are identical or stereotyped in subsets of patients [23– 27], suggesting that these BCRs bind similar antigens


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122