14


AFRICA ENVIRONMENT OUTLOOK 3 • Authors’ Guide


Criteria for indicators (Meadows, 1998; The World Bank, 1997) include the following: • They should be developed within an accepted analytical framework


• Be clearly defined and easy to understand • Be subject to aggregation (from household to community, and community to nation)


• Be objective (independent of the data collector) • Have reasonable data requirements (either data that are available or data that can be collected at low cost and within the ability of the country’s statistical agencies)


• Be relevant to the users • Be limited in number • Reflect causes, process or results (or pressure, state and responses)


• Take gender differences into account, if appropriate


The AEO Data Working Group notes that in some cases, several indicators will have to be used in analyzing processes, or changes, especially in trying to establish relationships,


Figure 2: The Hybrid Opportunities – DPSEEA Framework


The framework is divided into two but still shows the inter-connectedness: the soceity (people) and the environment (and its opportunitites).


The added value to the DPSIR, Opportunities, Vulnerability and DPSEEA frameworks is that this hybrid framework clearly shows that the state of the environment creates conditions that can make a society vulnerable to exposure to the effects of a degraded environment while at the same time it can also create opportunities for a habitable environment.


While providing for an assessment of the Impact, the framework also puts emphasis on discussion of the Effects on society’s health.


Central to the framework are Actions/ Responses, which should be targeted at all the elements of the framework with the aim to:


• Reduce the environment;


• Improve the state of the environment;


• Create opportunities for a habitable environment; society’s


• Reduce exposure degraded environment; and,


• Manage the effects on society of a degraded environment.


Source: Adapted from UNEP (2009). IEA T


and Impact Assessment for Adaptation to Climate Change. UNEP. Nairobi.


raining Manual Volume T wo: V ulnerability to a pressure on the


or causality. It is necessary for CCs, and authors who are developing or using indicators in the AEO-3 report, to specify how and why the indicator was chosen, make sure that it is clearly defined, and specify its relationship to the issue being analysed, and how it can show something about that particular issue, environmental or social condition. This could be included in the text, or in a box near the relevant tables or graphics.


THE HYBRID OPPORTUNITIES-DPSEEA ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK


Combining both the Opportunities and the DPSEEA frameworks will provide a structure for analysing interrelated factors that impact on human health and well-being and how the opportunities provided by the environmental assets determine or are affected by environmental health outcomes. It will be relevant in Africa where the majority of people depend directly on the environment; and where there is a direct link between the health of both the people and the environmental assets on which they depend.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38