This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Asking the Big Questions The five top-rated presentations at the 115th


Can metal castings exhibit the mate- rial properties of wrought alloys? Tese were among the questions


W Addressing Quality


In “Understanding Quality in Alu- minum Castings,” Geoffrey Sigworth, Foseco, Cleveland, examined the “pervasive yet elusive” concept of metal quality. Sigworth began by exam- ining the standard molds typically used to evaluate quality and went on to analyze several numerical indexes and other statistical data that are used to determine quality. Finally, Sigworth offered advice on how to define relative quality in individual facilities.


Conclusions • Finding a scientific basis to evaluate the quality of a casting is important so metalcasters and casting engineers under- stand the relative quality of a delivered casting and whether


asked by the more than 150 presenters at the 115th


Metalcasting Congress,


held April 5-8 in Schaumburg, Ill. Tey were also among the questions asked in the presentations receiving the highest marks by their peers. Five presentations at this year’s con-


gress received perfect (or nearly perfect) scores from their panel of peer review- ers. Following is a look at the questions posed and conclusions reached in each of the five presentations.


Metalcasting Congress tackled important issues and delivered intriguing results. A MODERN CASTING STAFF REPORT


hat does “qual- ity” mean? What is the best way to cast magnesium?


What is the best way to cast magnesium?


• Standardizing quality measures shows a wide range of competence exists in the metalcasting industry. Metalcasters must therefore use improved practices (innovative casting processes and improved degassing, metal filtration and flux- ing) in order to bring their quality up to the highest level.


the caster can improve on it.


• Maintaining the best metal condi- tions for reducing oxide films, porosity and brittle intermetallic phases is the most effective way to inhibit the loss of ductility and tensile strength in castings.


• Weibull statistics (fatigue data from analysis of failure rates) are a powerful tool in helping evaluate the quality of castings produced by a specific combination of metalcasting practices and mold design.


• Proper grain refinement and modi- fication are the primary means of improving the pore size in castings, which are primarily affected by casting solidification rates.


affected by the size of the largest pore, or in some cases largest oxide film, found within it. These condi- tions can be improved through better melt treatment.


Ultrasonic Testing Comes Out on Top According to Robert Tuttle,


• The fatigue life of a casting is most


Saginaw Valley State Univ., Saginaw, Mich., many steel casting facilities have expressed concern about the reli- ability of ultrasonic testing of castings with heavy section thicknesses. Typi- cally, these metalcasters conduct x-ray testing without the same concerns. In “A Gage R&R Study of the


ASTM A609 Ultrasonic Testing Standard,” Tuttle examined the variances he could find among different operators using the test. Would it prove to be less repeat- able than x-ray testing? In the study, five plates were


cast with varying levels of shrink- age defects. Te plates were then x-rayed and ultrasonically tested by five different metalcasting facilities.


Geoffrey Sigworth’s work on quality concluded that the fatigue life of a casting is most affected by the size of the largest pore found within it.


Conclusions • X-ray ratings showed a dramatic variation between metalcasting facilities.


May 2011 MODERN CASTING | 51


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76