HOT TEARING OF ALUMINUM ALLOYS A CRITICAL LITERATURE REVIEW
S. Li and D. Apelian Metal Processing Institute, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA Copyright © 2011 American Foundry Society Abstract
Hot tearing is a common and severe defect in casting and it is perhaps the pivotal issue defining an alloy’s castability. The subject has been extensively studied through various perspectives for decades and more recently computational models have been developed; however, despite these accomplishments there is confusion in the literature. The governing mechanisms and the control of hot tearing are not totally clear. Experiments show inconsistent results and different opinions exist about what roles processing or alloy factors play. WPI’s Casting Center (ACRC) initiated a major project devoted to developing a reliable experimental
Introduction
Hot tearing is a common and serious defect encountered during solidification of castings. It is also referred to as hot cracking, hot shortness or hot brittleness. Irrespective of the name, it is an irreversible defect that appears as cracks, ei- ther on the surface or inside the casting. Hot tears are gener- ally large and visible to the naked eye. Sometimes, they can also be small and only be observed using magnetic particle inspection and penetrating dyes, etc.1
It generally consists
of a main tear and numerous minor offshoots, which follow intergranular paths, and the failure surface reveals a dendrit- ic morphology.2
sively studied and many test techniques and computational models were developed. Novikov,3 al.5
The subject of hot tearing has been exten- Sigworth,4
and Eskin et have authored reviews on hot tearing. The various stud-
ies show that hot tearing is a complex phenomenon. It lies at the intersection of heat flow, fluid flow and mass flow, and various factors influence its formation. The variables in- clude alloy composition, mold properties, casting design and process parameters, etc.5
trolled casting process mitigate and limit hot tearing.4,6
A fine grain structure and a con- Over
the years much work has been devoted to understanding the mechanism of hot tearing. In general, it is accepted that hot tearing occurs due to shrinkage and thermal deformation developed during solidification. However, whether thermal stress or thermal strain, or strain rate is the controlling fac- tor is still not clear. Moreover, how hot tearing is measured (or controlled) is not standardized and a reliable predictive model is in need.
International Journal of Metalcasting/Winter 11
apparatus/methodology to quantitatively study hot tearing and to use it in studying the effects of various parameters on hot tearing. As part of this endeavor, a comprehensive literature review was conducted. The review focuses on: (i) Theories of hot tearing; (ii) Hot tearing variables; and (iii) Test methods. A summary of hot tearing criteria/models are also provided.
Keywords: hot tearing, aluminum alloys, process parameters, grain structure, hot tearing measurement, hot tearing criteria and models
Theories of Hot Tear Formation Theories Based on Stress, Strain, and Strain Rate
Hot tearing has been investigated since the beginning of 20th century. In the early days much was said about hot tears and how to prevent them, especially in steel castings, however, little was known of the mechanism of formation. The first at- tempt to understand the mechanism for hot tears was carried out in 1928 by Körber and Schitzkowski; they conducted a systematic study of hot tearing in carbon steels.7
In their
study, hot tears were intentionally produced in flanged steel bars by hindered contraction; it was found that hot tears most likely occurred in a temperature range from 1250 to 1300C (2282 to 2372F). Thereafter, it was believed for years that hot tears were formed at temperatures below solidus based on the experiments.8,9
In the early 1930s Briggs and Gezelius10,11 continued Körber
and Schitzkowski’s work and studied the stress evolution during solidification in a steel bar. The bar was designed in a way that there were no sharp thermal gradients in the casting therefore they did not break under contraction. Their work did not show the actual amount of stress necessary to cause hot tears, but intentionally showed the load-carrying ability of steel under hindered contraction.8
In 1936, Verö12 proposed that hot tearing in aluminum alloys
was caused by the stresses developed from the contraction of the primary crystals during solidification of the alloy. Dur-
23
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87