This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
INDIAN SMEs


“ IN 2006, THE TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION FORECASTING AND ASSESSMENT COUNCIL (TIFAC) UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, INITIATED A PROGRAMME AIMED AT PROVIDING R&D AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT TO SELECT CLUSTERS OF MICRO, SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES (MSMES) THROUGH AN APPROACH BASED ON ESTABLISHING AND LEVERAGING ACADEMIC AND INDUSTRY INTERACTION.”


New brands and new designs spring up almost on a daily basis in the market. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are a driving force behind these innovations. SMEs represent 90 percent of enterprises in most countries. Despite their importance to the economy and the potential off ered by the IP system for enhancing SMEs’ competitiveness, SMEs oſt en underutilise the IP system, and their creative and innovative capacity is not always fully exploited. T is is because many SMEs are not aware of the IP system or the protection it can provide for their inventions, brands and designs. To many SMEs, IP is still an unknown concept; they think that the game can be understood only by experts. SMEs are faced with several questions. Why should they pay attention to IP? How can they survive in the international trade arena? What role can the government play in making SMEs more competitive? How can intellectual property generate wealth in the business?


Relevance of the IP system to SMEs


T ere is a need for greater understanding on the part of SMEs. According to United Nations Industrial Organization (UNIDO) estimates, there are approximately 350 small and medium- sized industry clusters in India. Taking full


advantage of the IP system enables companies to profi t from their innovative capacity and creativity, which promotes and aids further innovation. Forward-looking enterprises must extract the potential value of their IP and use it eff ectively in their business strategy. SMEs with a strong technological base, international business outlook, competitive spirit and willingness to restructure can withstand the present challenges and come out with their own contribution to the Indian economy. IP protection helps:


• Prevent competitors from copying or imitating products and services


• Avoid unnecessary investment in research and development, and marketing


• Create a corporate identity through trademark and branding strategies


• Increase market value


• Acquire venture capital and enhance access to fi nance


• Exploit licensing, franchising or other IP-related contractual transactions


• Provide access to new markets.


Support initiatives for SMEs IPR protection and management are not just the concern of individuals and enterprises. T e complexities that come with managing the


64 World Intellectual Property Review November/December 2010


various IPRs necessitate specifi c expertise and support systems. Many support institutions have been established in India, whose basic function is fundamentally twofold: to create awareness and consciousness amongst stakeholders of the various issues surrounding IPR protection and management, and to facilitate the acquisition, protection and management of IPRs.


Government and public sector initiatives


T e Small Industries Development Organization (SIDO) is the Indian central SME development agency, which operates under the Ministry of Small Scale Industries. SIDO partners and networks with other national providers of support and fi nancial services to SMEs, such as the Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI), the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the National Small Industries Corporation (NSIC), the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) and other relevant government and regional agencies. SIDO has conducted IPR workshops for SMEs. Typically, each workshop comprises four technical sessions: the fi rst is completely non- technical and pitched to the layman with a clear intent to create an interest in IPRs; the other three sessions concern patents, trademarks, industrial designs and copyrights, but once


www.worldipreview.com


©iStockphoto.com / Devonyu


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108