Case Study Database versus search engine


Specialist databases yield results that are less easily found through Google, reveals research by energy-information database ETDEWEB


There is plenty of enthusiasm for search engines like Google from researchers and the general public alike. Google and Google Scholar are well-known for the wide breadth of the information they search. Google brings in news, factual and opinion- related information, and Google Scholar also emphasises scientific content across many disciplines. But do these search tools give as comprehensive a picture of a particular research field as a specialist database? This is the question that the


team behind the specialised scientific database on energy- related information, ETDEWEB (the Energy Technology Data Exchange – World Energy Base) set out to answer by studying user search results.


‘Nearly 90 per cent of the results in


ETDEWEB were not shown by Google or Google Scholar’


ETDEWEB is the online database of the Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE), an information exchange agreement formed in 1987 under the framework of the International Energy Agency. ETDE’s mission is to provide governments, industry and the research community in the member countries with access to the information collected and to increase dissemination to developing countries. More than 110 countries have free access to ETDEWEB.


www.researchinformation.info Search terms


ETDE member countries and partners contribute database records/documents representing worldwide energy research, science and technology R&D results, including policy, environmental and economic aspects. As of early 2010, the ETDEWEB database had more than 4.3 million citations to world-wide energy literature. There are more than 300,000 documents in PDF available for viewing from the ETDE site and more than a million additional


links to where the documents can be found at research organisations and major publishers globally.


The study The ETDE team compared the results of 15 energy-related queries performed on all three systems – ETDEWEB, Google and Google Scholar – using identical words/ phrases. A variety of subjects were chosen, although the topics were mostly in renewable energy areas, due to broad international interest in this area.


4000 Google


Google Scholar ETDE


3000 More than 40,000 search result 2000


records from the three sources were evaluated. The study concluded that ETDEWEB is a significant resource to energy experts for discovering relevant energy information. In the 15 searches, nearly 90 per cent of the results in ETDEWEB were not shown by Google or Google Scholar, although many of these relevant results could be found in the search engines if the exact article titles were entered as the search terms. Much was learned from


1000 0


the study beyond just metric comparisons. Observations about the strengths of each system and factors impacting the search results are also shared, along with tables of the results. If a user knows the title of


a document, all three systems are helpful in finding the user a source for the document. But if the user is looking to discover relevant documents on a specific topic, each of the three systems will bring back a considerable volume of data, but quite different in focus. Google is certainly a highly-used and valuable tool to find significant ‘non-specialist’ information, and Google Scholar does focus on scientific disciplines. If a user’s interest is scientific and energy-specific, ETDEWEB continues to hold a strong position in the energy research, technology and development (RTD) information field and adds considerable value in knowledge discovery.


Debbie Cutler is the Energy Technology Data Exchange operating agent at DOE/OSTI in the USA. The full study results are available at www.etde.org/ETDEOA237.pdf


Research Information December 2010/January 2011 29


Hits


“wind turbine arrays” offshore “energy recovery” “waste heat” CCS “underground storage” “biomass fuels” ethanol


“radioactive waste management” dismantling “solar cells” energy output


“fly ash” transport fossil fuel “power plants” “climate change” ocean circulation hydroelectric power plants turbines daylighting office buildings


plasma accelerator performance geothermal heat pumps


Photovoltaic power plants design


proton exchange membrane fuel cells performance solar collectors water heating efficiency Averages


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44