Public health Rainwater
Blue roof vs traditional method
Traditional roof
Roof type: flat roof office building, 5,000 sq m
Outflow: 15 litres per second for a one in 100 year storm
Scenario one: Category two storm intensity for a two minute storm = 0.062 litres per second per sq m (BS 12056 Part 3) Total flow rate = 310 l/s
Conclusion: Using a traditional approach, the entire system, from the outlets through to the underground drainage, would need to be sized to remove this peak flow (although time of concentration allowances can be made on larger systems).
Blue roof
Scenario two: If we look at the same location and storm, but choose to install a truly flat roof with outlets (or other means) restricting the flow rate from the roof to the required 15 l/s:
Temporary available ‘pond’ space: 3,750 sq m (assuming 25% volume of the roofscape is taken up by plant bases or other structures)
Conclusion: Looking at a range of storm durations from one minute to several hours and an outflow rate of 15 l/s, the maximum depth of water on the roof would only reach 40mm! (Most rainwater outlet manufacturers assume 35mm head of water over their outlets to achieve the stated flow rates.)
As the storm intensity decreases and the outlet capacities begin to exceed the rainfall rate, the roof will slowly clear of water. In this example, after 3.5 hours the water will have cleared, with the exception of some minor ponding retained in any depressions in the flat slab caused by building tolerances.
A void can be used to both attenuate and store water for harvesting >
book as it will be important that the calculated volume on the roof is not reduced during the installation of tenant plant on the roof, for example. The roof waterproofing must, of course, be carefully
designed, and the suppliers/contractors happy to provide the necessary guarantees, which should be little different from those required for a green roof. So, what could the next step be? In the example described in the panel on the left, we use only 40mm of the potential 180mm structural capacity for water storage. Could the next step be to install a shallow crate or paving pedestal system, across the flat roof to provide a storage zone beneath a pedestrian accessible area and re-use the collected rainwater? Currently, a typical rainwater harvesting system may
consist of the following elements: • Conveyance of the water from the roof as quickly as possible in large pipework;
• Routing roof water to an underground tank in its own system of underground drainage;
• Pumping water back up to a ground-level plant room; and
• Pumping water again to distribute it through the building. In this example, if we were to construct the rainwater
outlets as standpipes, creating a storage zone of 40mm beneath it as rainwater harvesting, it would yield a storage volume in excess of 120,000 litres. The rainwater harvesting could then consist of: • Storage at source with small bore pipework delivering water by gravity to the treatment plant;
• Pumped distribution to fittings; and • No associated underground drainage or tanks To use water stored in this manner for rainwater
harvesting may require some additional treatment because of the higher storage temperatures and potentially less effective silt removal. However, when the energy, carbon and cost of such a simplified system are taken into account, this becomes insignificant. (Roughly speaking, the use of the pumps will be reduced by 50%, so energy consumption may be reduced by about 40%. Embodied energy/carbon would be reduced in line with the reduced materials as given in the box, top right.) Every building is different, but the public health
engineer is well placed to become the person to advise the design team on what solution, or combination of solutions, best delivers the environmental aspirations
46 CIBSE Journal September 2010 Attenuation for free?
Using a 5,000 sq m, six-storey building, the traditional approach to rainwater disposal may consist of:
Roof membrane Screed laid to falls 45 rainwater outlets
550m of 100-150mm diameter rainwater pipe 470m of 150-450mm dia
underground drainage Total traditional system without attenuation
£225,000 £90,000 £6,000 £16,000 £35,000
£372,000
During the planning process a requirement for 218 cu m of attenuation is identified.
underground attenuation tank Total cost
£50,000 £422,000
Blue roof approach: Total traditional system without attenuation £372,000
Add: enhanced roof membrane Add: higher waterproofing detailing Add: above ground flow attenuators
Omit: screed laid to falls Omit: 39 rainwater outlets
Omit: reduction in rainwater pipework Omit: reduced underground drainage
Total blue roof attenuated system
+£60,000 +£17,000 +£3,000
-£90,000 -£5,000 -£14,000 -£28,000
£315,000
and value for the client. If we can reconsider the need to drain flat roofs quickly, with no residual water, then it will give us, as designers, significant scope for innovation, cost reduction and real sustainability benefits. Just as the building services engineer is now an
essential member of the conceptual design team, advising on building form in relation to energy and ventilation, perhaps it is time for the public health engineer to forge a role in the early design stages to add value and shape the way in which a development manages its impact on the water environment. l
Carl Harrop IEng FCIPHE MCIWEM MSoPHE is an associate director with multi-disciplinary consultancy, WSP
www.cibsejournal.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88