This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Recent updates reveal 6 million people surf the Web for medical advice daily, but only a quarter follow rec- ommended guide- lines for evaluating the quality of a website’s advice. “It is imperative that consumers seek medical and health advice from reputable websites,” says Samanthi Hewakapuge, consumer health co- ordinator for the National Network of Libraries of Medicine. “Anyone can post information on the Internet, and one needs to be selective when searching for medical information.” Hewakapuge suggests starting

D

with websites from well-known health organizations and the govern- ment, such as the Consumer and Patient Health Information Section (CAPHIS) of the Medical Library Association, which provides a search engine and a list of the top 100 health care websites at http://caphis.mlanet .org/consumer/index.html. The sites listed are reviewed based on guidelines developed by the Agency

5 6 MI L I T A R Y O F F I C E R J U N E 2 0 1 0

DO YOU RECEIVE MORE HEALTH INFORMATION FROM THE INTER- NET THAN FROM YOUR DOCTOR?

If so, you’re far from alone. In a 2008 national survey, the PewInternet and American Life Proj- ect found 72 million people in the U.S. have gone online to find health informa- tion. This accounts for 62 percent of all Internet users.

of Healthcare Research and Policy Consumers. The guidelines include credibility, sponsorship/authorship, content, audience, currency, disclo- sure, purpose, links, design, interac- tivity, and caveats. Consumers also should look for

websites that have taken the extra step of gaining accreditation from either the Utilization Review Accreditation Commission (URAC) or the Health on the Net Foundation (HON). URAC is an independent, nonprofit organiza- tion promoting health care quality through accreditation and certifica- tion of websites. The organization began providing quality improvement for privacy and security, health con- tent, disclosure of financial relation- ships, linking policies, consumer complaints, and emerging best prac- tices 14 years ago. Websites requesting accreditation are evaluated against

more than 50 standards, developed by a committee of health care providers, consumers, and health website com- panies, to ensure they deliver quality health content and services. Sites are reevaluated annually and randomly in between, and any complaints will trigger an unscheduled review. Con- sumers can research information on accredited websites at www.urac.org. HON, a nonprofit NGO accredited

by the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations, has been in operation for 12 years and focuses on the provision of health information on the Internet. To evaluate health care websites, the organization uses eight guiding principles, including qualification of authors, privacy of users, attribution of information, and ability to back claims. HON currently accredits roughly 6,800 websites in 118 countries. To find Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88