automation & asset management feature
that the multiple users can start their editing functionality the temptation with Final Cut Pro so EDLs can be
different tasks as quickly as possible. will be to use it, and to waste time passed to and fro.
With the IPV solution, it is available looking for a tool rather than getting Where the journalist completes the
on desktops within a few seconds of on with telling the story simply and edit, then when it is published, the
the ingest server starting to record. delivering it quickly. asset management system has to
Technically that is very hard. For this reason, some news
In news...the
replace the browse proxies with the
Streaming the video to desktops is system vendors have developed best way to full resolution content at the point of
practical, but that is not enough in specific editors for use on the
gain and
rendering. Intelligence in the system
this application. Users will want to journalist’s desktop, which are just
retain an
will allow stories to be rendered in
scrub forwards and backwards equipped with the appropriate
through the content, looking for functionality. At IPV we have
audience is
advance wherever possible to limit
the load on the hardware, while
keyframes to describe and edit points developed such a tool.
by delivering
allowing for live rendering at the
to cut. So the format has to be robust However, we have noticed
authoritative
point of playout if that is all time
enough to allow free movement recently a different approach by news content allows for.
through all the content available. some broadcasters. Adobe Premiere
faster than
One advantage of using a high
The main reason to give has an underlying architecture which
your
quality browse system such as IPV
immediate access to the content is to allows it to be customised by the
allow journalists to start cutting user. In a newsroom application a
competition.
SpectreView is that it may well be
possible to publish the proxy edit for
stories. There is a range of attitudes lightweight version can be skinned some applications. Where a story will
to editing for news, but there is no with just the tools which are needed, be used on a mobile phone or over
doubt that the growing trend is for but which can be fed with IPV the open Internet, there is little to
journalists to cut their own stories browse content, allowing the gain by rendering out the full quality
using desktop editors. This is logical: journalist to start cutting the story as material - perhaps in HD - just to
the journalist understands the story the pictures are ingested. have it reduced to lower resolution
better than anyone, will know what The advantage, apart - of course - then subject to harsh compression for
has been shot and where the key from using a stable software product the delivery platform.
soundbites can be found. which is enjoying continuing This is another big gain in speed.
While editing software like Final development, is that it uses open Stories can be placed on a website
Cut Pro is now available at very low standards so it can integrate very quickly indeed. Coupled with the
cost indeed, there are risks in giving comfortably into the broadcast ease of accessing content and speed
something so richly functional to environment. If a rough cut by a of editing using a tool such as Adobe
journalists working under pressure. If journalist needs smoothing by a craft Premiere, the idea of a journalist
you give someone the full panoply of editor, Premiere integrates smoothly cutting different versions of a story -
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
o
n
P
a
g
e
2
6
.
www.ibeweb.com l january/february 2010 l ibe l 23
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44