SPONSORED: ENVIRONMENT/ENERGY


Solid-state illumination Light Engines for photoresponsivity characterisation


A look at the advantages of solid- state illumination sources in the characterisation of photovoltaic devices and solar fuel cells, including use case examples


A


rtificial light sources are essential for the characterisation of photo-


responsivity of photovoltaic devices and solar fuel cells. Traditionally, xenon arc or tungsten-halogen lamps, equipped with sources with spectral outputs that are not readily amenable to controlled adjustment and with relatively short operating lifetimes, have been used for this purpose.


Consequently, they are now being superseded by solid-state illuminators based on arrays of LEDs and/or diode lasers. This case study provides examples of the utility of solid-state illumination sources for the characterisation of photovoltaic devices and solar fuel cells and outlines some of their inherent technical advantages. In the course of the development of halide perovskites (HP) as low- cost, high-efficiency photovoltaic materials, a team of researchers at the University of Washington in Seattle1


used optical transmittance


measurements to quantitatively assess the effects of oxygen, humidity and illumination flux on the degradation of a prototypical HP, methylammonium lead iodide (MAPbI3). Sample illumination was supplied by a Retra Light Engine from Lumencor, providing incident photon fluxes of 1-10 suns (1 sun


= 100 mW/cm2). Two predominant modes of HP degradation were identified – dry photooxidation (DPO) occurring in the absence of vapour-phase water and a water-accelerated photooxidation (WPO) pathway (Figure 1). WPO proceeds faster than DPO, even at a very low humidity. These results have significant implications for the design of both encapsulation schemes for halide perovskite photovoltaics and accelerated testing protocols for service lifetime prediction. In contrast to photovoltaic


technologies, which seek to generate electricity directly from sunlight, the goal of artificial photosynthesis is to convert sunlight into stored chemical energy. This can be accomplished by splitting water into hydrogen fuel and oxygen in photoelectrochemical cells (PEC). Researchers at the University


of North Carolina (UNC) have described a second-generation, dye-sensitised PEC that achieves greatly enhanced visible-light- driven water splitting efficiencies. Performance evaluation was carried out using the 445nm light output from a Lumencor SPECTRA Light Engine2


. More recently, another


UNC research team used a Spectra X Light Engine to determine the spectral dependence of hydrogen generation by silicon nanowire based PECs3


. In addition to their consistent Figure 1


and reliable performance, the utility of solid-state illuminators for photoresponsivity testing derives from their modular design and programmable electronic controls. For example, broad spectral coverage can be obtained from arrays of LEDs. The relative output intensities of the LED elements in an array – in which intensity is well controlled, and predictable due, in large part, to its linear behaviour – enables synthesis of user-specified spectral distributions (Figure 2). The spectral outputs of a Magma Light Engine from Lumencor, incorporating 21 individually addressable LED light sources, range from 365 to 1050nm. The LED outputs are merged into a common optical train directed to the light output port on the front panel


Figure 3


and may be initiated in parallel or serial under the control of a single, onboard microprocessor. Adjustment of the relative output intensities of the 21 elements of the LED array enables synthesis of user-specified spectral distributions. Photocurrent generated per incident unit optical power is a key performance metric for both photovoltaic materials and photoelectrochemical fuel cells. Solid state illuminators provide the precise control of incident optical power required for accurate characterisation of these dose- response relationships. The demonstrable capacity for


controlled light output derives from on/off switching with millisecond precision and microprocessor- enabled linearisation of output power. Figure 3 shows the filtered (475+/-14nm) LED output from a Spectra Light Engine detected by a calibrated photodiode. Output power is programmatically increased by 20% for each successive 250ms pulse. The control response is precisely linear as indicated by the R value of 1.0 (inset). The precise and reproducible


performance of solid-state lighting like that of these Lumencor Light Engines enables characterisation of photovoltaic devices and solar fuel cells. The ability to precisely control the illumination optical output in terms of spectral content, spectral breadth, linearity, and temporal control offers unique advantages over other sorts of solid-state lighting and enables inherent technical advantages for these sorts of photochemical applications, both in discrete experimental protocols and for the implementation of large scale production and quality control. l


References


1 Water-accelerated photooxidation of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite. TD Siegler, WA Dunlap-Shohl, HW Hillhouse et al., J Am Chem Soc (2022) 144:5552−5561


2 Visible photoelectrochemical water splitting into H2 and O2 in a dye-sensitized photoelectrosynthesis cell. L Alibabaei, BD Sherman, TJ Meyer et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2015) 112:5899–5902


3 Water splitting with silicon p-i-n superlattices suspended in solution. TS Teitsworth, DJ Hill, JF Cahoon et al., Nature (2023) 614:270–274


Figure 2


Further information


For more information about solid light engines for characterising photovoltaic devices and solar fuel cells, visit: www.lumencor.com


Photonics Frontiers 2023 13


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58