search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ANALYSIS: STARTUPS


Can a scientist be a good entrepreneur?


David Giltner, founder of TurningScience, discusses whether these two seemingly different career paths can successfully overlap


T


urning a new technology into a product is one of the most exciting things


that a scientist can do while working in the private sector. Starting one’s own company in order to commercialise new technology is even more exciting.


If it seems like we hear


more about entrepreneurship these days than ever, there is a good reason. The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor research project has been tracking entrepreneurial activity around the globe since 1998. In 2020 it reported a significant increase in entrepreneurial activity over the last 10 years in


4 Electro Optics June 2021


all of the 16 economies tracked, including the United States and major countries in Europe and Asia.1


This may all sound great


for ‘entrepreneurial types,’ but can a scientist expect to take part in this exciting trend? The fact that scientists discover new principles and invent new technologies that find their way into startups is well known. But is a scientist the right person to commercialise a new discovery themselves? Can a scientist successfully start and build their own company? Many people believe the roles of ‘scientist’ and ‘entrepreneur’ to be very different, and that a


scientist might not make a good entrepreneur. My experience says that this is not the case.


Perception vs reality I suspect the idea that a scientist would not make a very good entrepreneur comes largely from the common perception of a successful entrepreneur: an adrenaline junkie with nerves of steel who is willing to take a big risk to gamble on a ‘one-in-a-million’ idea. We’ve all heard stories of the founders of well-known tech companies who had amazing insight or took a risk on an idea few believed would actually work. These outlier examples can leave many scientists thinking that perhaps they don’t have what it takes to start their own company and turn their idea into reality. Can these two seemingly different career paths ever overlap? In 2010 Malcom Gladwell


wrote a great article The Sure Thing: How Entrepreneurs Really


“These scientists-turned- entrepreneurs don’t match the heroic risk taker image”


Succeed2 . In it he described


how the illusion many of us have about what it takes to be a successful entrepreneur is largely just that – an illusion. Successful entrepreneurs are actually planners who patiently look for the right opportunity. They take a calculated risk based on detailed analysis they have done to make sure they have a good chance for success. Malcom’s description of successful entrepreneurs sounds a lot more like the scientists that I know. My own experience says


that scientists can in fact be successful entrepreneurs. Over the last 12 years I’ve interviewed many scientists working in industry, and many of them have been successful entrepreneurs. These scientists- turned-entrepreneurs certainly


@electrooptics | www.electrooptics.com


g


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46