search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Open book: a librarian’s view


budget stood and its relation to the overall landscape of academic publishing. Communication channels used were a LibGuide, departmental email, brown bag sessions on the collection, campus announcements via the daily newsletter, and updates to faculty senate via a new faculty senate library committee, which also includes student representatives from undergraduate and graduate council. How collection decisions were made


was re-framed as a campus conversation that would be based on data. The library initiated cancellation suggestions instead of requesting them from faculty, which were rooted in cost-per-use. New acquisitions were offered as options based on data such as inter-library loan requests, turn-aways, and academic program growth.


Conclusions The results of implementing these new collection strategies have been encouraging, but not perfect. In the initial year, the library made modest journal cuts, which freed up funds to start many new journal subscriptions and several new databases. The feedback from faculty about the cancellation process and


subsequent usage of the new resources has been good. The second year of implementation saw an 8 per cent increase to the materials budget and many more needed resources. This, the third year saw only a 4 per cent increase, which was less than requested but it was a tougher economic year all around on campus. Even with the inadequate budget allotment, there was a marked difference from years past. It was a very collaborative process between university administration the library and faculty, with a healthy dialogue and greater understanding all round. I now feel better prepared, going


forward, to be able to tell a story with data in order to communicate a message and further strengthen our partnerships with faculty regarding collection management.


Anna Seiffert is head of collection management services at Arthur Lakes Library, Colorado School of Mines


Do Anna Seiffert’s experiences chime with you? Would you like to share your thoughts as a librarian with the readers of Research Information? Email tim.gillett@europascience.com


“Having national data as well having peer data was important”


nature.com


COLLABORATING TO ADDRESS THE KEY CONCERNS OF TODAY Nature Research Journals publishing from 2020


Nature Cancer


Nature Cancer will publish across the spectrum of the natural, applied and social sciences, from basic pre-clinical studies to translational and clinical work.


Nature Food


Nature Food will publish cutting edge research on all aspects of food production, processing, distribution and consumption that contribute to human and planetary health.


Nature Reviews Earth & Environment


Nature Reviews Earth & Environment will publish high quality Review, Perspective and Comment articles across all aspects of Earth and Environmental science.


For more information or to request a quote for your institution: springernature.com/newlaunches2020


www.researchinformation.info | @researchinfo A77531


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32