Page <#number#> of <#numberOfPages#>
Previous Page     Next Page        Smaller fonts | Larger fonts     com.yudu.plainText.returnToFlash

41 f A

nd so from sound to vision. Kerr remembers “Ewan Mac- Coll picked five of us from the Critics Group to go to Italy for a series of concerts.

Us women usually wore jeans or ski- pants and a jumper. He gave us a dress allowance, saying ‘you need to look like you’ve made a bit of an effort’. This did- n’t apply to the men.” She says her daughter Nancy (when she and Eliza Carthy were teenagers working together in a duo) “told me that men felt they had an absolute right to put their hand on her knee and make comments on how she looked. “Why don’t you smile a bit more darling’?”

And recently Tickell, putting on an event featuring her students, male and female, says, “It was the girl in the red dress. No one mentioned that the gui- tarist was in a blue shirt. His playing is not mixed up in how he looks. It is mixed up with the women.”

This is rammed home all the time on stages where female musicians are intro- duced with comments on what they’re wearing and “lovely girls, easy on the eye and they can play,” the most popular, or ”I wouldn’t mind one of those on my mantelpiece.”

In a music business stuffed full of men – the MCs, the technicians, the agents, managers, promoters – these casual remarks reflect a wider culture where woman’s value is not in their skill, talent, intelligence and capability but synony- mous with how much they’d like to shag her. Marks out of ten.

What she looks like precludes her from being seen, whether she’s young and luscious and fit ‘for the mantelpiece’ or older and not worth the bother. As Rhein- gans says, “I just want to go on stage and do my thing not having been introduced by someone who’s put you down.”

Following Newton’s Facebook post

that kicked off the conversation about the live situation for women musicians, Karine Polwart suggested she lead a panel discussion at Celtic Connections in 2017 on women in folk music. Newton says, “We were trying to put across views as to why things need to change without it feeling ‘us against them,’ without slag- ging off men. It’s not about that.” It was quite difficult, she says, as this was defi- nitely misunderstood.

With Jenn Butterworth and Michaela Atkins, Newton set up the BIT Collective – “A collective of people interested in dis- cussing and addressing gender issues in Scottish folk and traditional music,” and promoting gigs by upcoming women bands like the excellent HEISK. Over in Ire- land, Karen Casey set up Fair Plé with simi- lar aims, “to achieve gender balance in the production, performance, promotion, and development of Irish traditional and folk music. We advocate for equal opportunity and balanced representation for all.” Judging by some of the backlash, you’d think they had announced plans for a Communist putsch.

For according to an argument put for- ward on Newton’s Facebook page by one

Top: The Poozies with Mary MacMaster left. Middle: String Sisters with Catriona Macdonald left. Bottom: The Rheingans Sisters, Rowan left.

Photo: © Judith Burrows

Previous arrowPrevious Page     Next PageNext arrow        Smaller fonts | Larger fonts     com.yudu.plainText.returnToFlash
Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148