search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FOCUS


On the Summit


A packed schedule at the Fire Sector Summit saw key sector topics tackled by various speakers. William RoszczykandJan Wassallreport


J


ONATHAN O’NEILL, FPA managing director, reflected on Nick Ross’ speech at the pre event drinks (see pages 32-34), stating


his ‘wise words’ aligned with the need for ‘refl ection and the action to take’. He highlighted the importance of events ‘setting the agenda for fi re for the coming year’, musing on ‘our views being neglected by government’ in the past. The sector ‘can’t allow infi ghting to blur our goal’, must put differences aside, and ‘provide and articulate a strategy’ to avoid ministers receiving ‘mixed messages – look what happens when they do’. Chair Charlotte Hawkins refl ected on her


career and experience reporting on Grenfell Tower, noting the press ‘felt powerless as spectators’, but that the fire ‘brought home the issue of fi re safety to everyone’ by raising an ‘awful lot of questions’. She added this was ‘positive, but sad that it takes a disaster to effect change – let’s not let the lives lost be lost in vain’.


Construction standards


Dr Barbara Lane, head of fi re engineering at Arup, refl ected in the fi rst plenary that ‘making necessary changes or commitments’ on the handover of buildings was a major issue, highlighting the timeline from use to use


through design, specifi cation, construction and handover itself. It has ‘been clear for some time’ how


signifi cant fi re safety skills are, with ‘change needed in every profession’. Complexity occurs due to the series of construction stages with many stakeholders and disciplines, the ‘journey to having a compliant building’ requiring ‘clear translations all the way through to the fi nal assessments’. Her view was that ‘commercially driven decisions are altering the standards of compliance’, and every stakeholder or discipline should be checked. David Stow, associate director of Arup Fire, outlined the design stage and three frequent problems that can ‘erode or seriously undermine fi re safety’. First was the ‘ability of designers to understand materials they’re using’, as terms are ‘poorly understood by designers and teams’ or incorrectly applied alongside ‘unclear supplier information’. He refl ected on building façades in relation to Approved Document B of the Building Regulations (ADB), and ‘limited combustibility’, and asked ‘who knows what that means, or what products?’ To meet higher energy standards, there has


been a ‘drive to use environmentally friendly but combustible materials’. It can be diffi cult to


36 DECEMBER 2017/JANUARY 2018 www.frmjournal.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60