search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Taste enhancers optimizing performance of piglets through gut health


By Mathilde Ramillien, Pancosma SA


The impact of taste enhancers Commonly used in feed to enhance appetite by providing an attractive taste, the function of taste enhancers is to target the receptors of the 5 main tastes, namely: sweet, salty, bitter, acid and umami. Many tests and studies have demonstrated the positive effect on the condition and performance of animals. It is known that a good taste enhancer improves the taste of feed


and stimulates consumption. However, some molecules, such as monosodium glutamate (umami taste), present in some products, are known to trigger a hormonal secretion (CKK hormones) reducing appetite of animals. That’s why Pancosma focuses on sweet flavor enhancers that do not contain umami molecules, such as SUCRAM®


products which


trigger sweet taste receptors. Deeply involved in research on gut health, the Swiss company with a worldwide presence, has developed a solution to improve the performance of animals by stimulating their appetite while taking care of their intestinal health. These sweeteners trigger the sweet taste receptors (T1R2


and T1R3) mainly known to be located on the tongue of animals. Nevertheless, they have also been identified in the digestive tract where they play a very important role. Giving special importance to the intestinal physiology of animals, Pancosma shows its expertise and know-how by publishing data from mechanistic and fundamental research on the gastrointestinal tract. Looking at the molecular physiology effects of the products, a


strong impact on the gut has been described including gut sensing, gut immunity and gut microbiota. This highlighted the “gut effects” which is promoted as ‘Intelligent Gut Action’ (IGA). The described effects at the intestinal level are: the release of glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) and the expression of the glucose transporter (SGLT-1). The GLP-2 hormone is involved in tissue repair and increases blood flow to the gut, which can improve digestion and absorption of nutrients in addition to preventing or repairing damages. And the expression of SGLT-1 will promotes glucose absorption. Therefore the use of a high intensity sweetener improves the integrity of the animal’s gut and the absorption of nutrients. Pancosma has an enriched knowledge in the development of


sweeteners formulas thanks to the expertise of their in-house flavorists, experts panelists and animal research focus. These patented and well- balanced formulas combining sweeteners, potentiators and enhancers are named under the SUCRAM®


SUCRAM® biotic like effect of SUCRAM®


More recently, a study has demonstrated the positive effect of on Lactobacillus population. This is the first report of a pre- influencing commensal gut microbiota.


Sweeteners can be used in a wide range of applications for many types of feed, such as creep feed, prestarter, starter, milk replacer, drinking water and for several species including piglets, pigs, sows, calves, beef and dairy cows. Formulations must be properly selected according to the targeted species and legislation of the area. For example a sweetener used for sows in Europe cannot be based on sodium saccharin. To fit these needs the SUCRAM®


portfolio also contains products based on brand. This combination ensures optimal


performance beyond traditional sweeteners. As this type of additive is usually incorporated at low doses, it is


essential that its quality and technology ensure a good mixability and even dispersion in feed. Therefore the technical constraints are crucial for an optimum effect: homogeneity, flowability, particle size distribution. This is the reason why all SUCRAM®


formulas are produced to have excellent


physical properties: products are 100% soluble, fluid, homogeneous, dust free, free from agglomeration and extremely stable. SUCRAM® to improve taste, mask bitterness and stimulate animals’ appetite.


products is used


Improvements on animals’ performance obtained with SUCRAM®


Besides good quality feed, favorable housing conditions, climate and farm management, a fast gut development and a good gut health are


PAGE 44 MARCH/APRIL 2019 FEED COMPOUNDER


natural sweeteners. Research projects to understand the specificities of sweet taste receptors in swine are ongoing. Pancosma emphasizes understanding the underlying mechanisms of the gut effect of sweeteners in swine, in order to offer new solutions to the market.


Continuously providing innovative and adapted solutions In addition to sweet taste receptors the gut also has the ability to detect other taste compounds (umami and bitter) non-nutrients such as phytonutrients, including capsaicin (from chili peppers) and cinnamaldehyde (from cinnamon). Pancosma offers a large range of products such as flavors,


phytonutrients or minerals that can be combined in complex and complete solutions called TakTik®


products.


Want to learn more? Contact our expert Mathilde RAMILLIEN Product Manager Palatants – Flavorist Tel + 41 22 929 84 62 Mob + 41 79 174 19 39 www.pancosma.com


key parameters in the growing process of animals. To maximize this development from the earliest stages of the animals’ life, the diet should be attractive and palatable. A sweetened feed is more likely to be accepted by young animals when solid foods are offered to them for the first time. Once the feed is ingested, SUCRAM®


will first be detected by


receptors on the tongue and will give the feed a pleasant taste. Then it will be able to achieve its effects on the gut. Independent field trials of 384 weaned pigs revealed that the


high-quality sweetening product of Pancosma increased food consumption (+ 6%), body weight gain (+ 4.7%), and foods (-2.6%) (see Figure 1).


Figure 1: Field trial results of piglets fed a sweetener* product versus control diet


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60