search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Paul Cayar


Rob Weiland


On all our heads


My father was a staunch supporter of the Dutch liberal party and did much work for ‘his’ party. At his funeral the local chairman of the party remem- bered him as the ‘social conscience of the party for his constituency’ and indeed he was. In his footsteps I try to be the conscience of the TP52 class. Sport, and certainly professional


sport, tend to focus on the winners. Few concern themselves with those not on stage, at best in the belief that the example set by the winners is enough to spur all others to wish to be equally strong and esteemed (and to happily keep trying till success is achieved!). The risk is therefore understood that this narrow focus promotes


a mentality often described as ‘winning at all cost’. Certainly when the game is also a hobby, and for the TP52 owners it certainly is, even if well controlled for rule compliance, this unavoidably leads to soon not having many out there to play. This might be seen as a victory by the last man standing but it is not a victory that makes much sense. Sailing, like most sports, has many mainly unwritten laws on


sportsmanship that draw on a long Anglo-Saxon tradition, with a bit of fantasy going back to the times when the tales of King Arthur were created describing his acts of chivalry. Over centuries the British gentleman became a model for conduct and decorum, symbolised by sports like cricket and tennis. ‘That’s not cricket’ is still universally understood but certainly not


universally practised – not even in cricket. Competition gets com- plicated as soon we get anywhere near terms like the spirit of the rules, fair play, Corinthian and sportsmanship. In sailing we even struggle with the term ‘amateur’. Many sports having starting off as a game when they grew popular then followed the path to becoming small business and from there


34 SEAHORSE


big business. Once substantial money is involved sport soon becomes part of the entertainment industry... and work for those who once used to ‘play’. Not that one cannot enjoy one’s job but the goals and stakes are


different. This then translates to and gets visible in how the game is played: anything not strictly forbidden by the rules becomes legit- imate and limits, whether for equipment or actions on the water, are sought without leaving any margin for error. When non-stop competing on the edge has become the main


attraction of the game can we still rhyme this with the basic principles of RRS2 Fair Sailing: a boat and her owner shall compete in com- pliance with recognised principles of sportsmanship and fair play? Or with the fundamental principle of sportsmanship that when competitors break a rule they will promptly take a penalty, which may be to retire? When so much is on the limit that there is little chance of knowing


for certain whether in, on or out, we may be left to, at least sometimes, wonder whether it is good sportsmanship to push as hard as we do and whether we honestly can expect those charged to judge to call each case to perfection? The fun of a box rule, of course, has to be sought in bringing the


boats exactly on the box limits but then one has to accept that at times boats will unavoidably be over some of the limits as use of equipment, temperature variation, measurement inaccuracies and so on are not being catered for by keeping any safety margin. When you see a fleet of TP52s ready to go racing at a 52 Super Series event they are all true TP52s because they are certified as such. Each boat will not comply in every detail as well as their compliance


or non-compliance with the class rules not being perfectly identical over the period of the regatta. Certainly not if we check chasing 1mm or 2mm differences, but each of them should comply if we check


ROBERT DEAVES


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118