search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Getting here


      


I was asked recently, ‘What got you into designing?’ To which the honest answer is ‘foils’. Early in 1977, aged just 19, I was sailing


with Phil (Pod) O’Donnell and Donny Hanks on Singapore Airlines, which was quite possibly the first Kevlar/foam 18ft skiff, before wings and stupidly light, probably lighter than a 49er. There was a ‘stiff’ southerly, we had


come around the Double Bay mark head- ing into Taylor Bay, I was in the beak (forward hand), spinnaker on, and we had some pace on. It was said that we were doing well over 30kt, but I discount that, because it was way above the then recog- nised world speed record.


64 SEAHORSE Pod had already won an Olympic gold


medal in Kiel sailing Dragons with John Cuneo in 1972. He was not an idiot. But halfway down that run it all went pear- shaped and ended in tears, lots of them. After the race Pod was bitching in the


park about the rudder, and I stupidly said, ‘I reckon I can do better.’ He looked at me and said, if you can, I will buy it and sing your praises, if you can’t, you wear it! I had a week to put up or shut up. To cut a long story short, within two


years we were making 90 per cent of all the foils in the 18ft fleet. Within five years it was 100 per cent plus most of the other skiffs… and probably half of the other dinghies racing on the harbour. Truth is that 99 per cent of sailors read


about a hull and then flick immediately to the rig. They rarely spend much time or interest on foils at all. Yet if you think about it a bit more


closely, there are only two things that make your boat go forward and they are, to use one of my father’s favourite lines, ‘the foil in the air, and the foil in the water’… to which he added ‘and a bit of low-drag flotation in between’.


My stock response to people, when they


ask me what I think sailing is, is that it is ‘the exploitation of the velocity differences of two mediums’. And if you’re a devotee of Newton (and if you’re not you should be), for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. So by definition the foil in the water is


equally as important as the foil in the air. And relatively speaking… whereas a change of 2/3/4mm is important with respect to the rig, 0.2-0.3-0.4mm is impor- tant with respect to your foils. Why? The most common response is


water is more dense than air – correct, 812 times denser approximately. But, far more importantly, water is incompressible (whereas air is very compressible indeed). Having helped Dad [Frank Bethwaite]


with wind tunnels and doing all that research I completely get why a naval architect goes and grabs the NACA book of wing sections – the one on my shelf beside me was published the year before I was born – because it’s so easy to do. And 90 per cent of the time it is a mistake. We learned in 1976, with the K1


women’s kayak event at the Montreal Games, that the K1s were always faster in the St Laurence Seaway (10m+ deep) than they were on the Olympic track (4m deep). If a 60kg woman, with a 12kg K1, doing 19kph (9kt) max is suffering surface effect at 4m, then imagine the disturbance that a 250kg 49er (including crew) doing 9-11kt


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120