search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Above: the finished hull and deck wait to meet Jean Genie’s unusual keel with its generous fin area and a large trim tab plus delta-shaped ballasted endplate. The fat section also allows all the boat’s lead (bar trimming ballast) to be contained in the keel – other 5.5 Metres carry up to one-third of their lead as internal ballast (no wonder GBR 42 flies upwind – ed). The twin openings for self-bailers are aft; with a raised double floor plus big self-bailers the modern 5.5 is a drier beast to sail than even its recent predecessors were, where as in the 6 Metres continually pumping out was a specialist and demanding skill in itself. Note too the way the soft chine sharpens up dramatically aft, a trick that Star sailors have known about for many years as they pursue maximum planing area along with optimum spray dispersal. Left: dry-fitting the keel before fitting out


cooking process. To minimise this our moulds were constructed in glass fibre, so we had the same potential expansion rates as the parts being built inside. The deck mould included many ‘implants’


to create rebates for hatches as well as cleat wells, electrical system box, traveller recess and spinnaker storage area. This was again moulded in one shot. The internal structures were also all built in pre-preg using our long vacuum table and oven. Another rule of the 5.5 Metre class is


that the area in way of the keel, longitudi- nally not less than 1/3 of the length overall, 200mm wide and 20mm thick, must be of solid or monolithic construction. This makes for what is in practice a solid glass


44 SEAHORSE


plank, which was constructed off a CNC tool while we were waiting for the hull moulds to arrive. It was subsequently treated as a core material which replaced the foam in the appropriate position. The bulkheads were built with return


flanges which increased the stiffness of the panel. The longitudinals got the same treatment, as they were practically the length of the boat and would have proved hard to handle otherwise. The multiple keel floors that the rule prescribes were built in two long sections and then cut to shape, again from CNC templates. In the end the join of the hull and deck


parts was simple, the glass taping on the outside to reinforce the join being laid


down in a shallow rebate so that the true shape could be realised. The ‘apex’ of the chine was then reconstructed with a very small amount of lightweight epoxy filler utilising templates. We relied heavily throughout on our


CNC router and CAD proficiency to cut all of the numerous moulds, plants, jigs and tools we required to build and check parts. Being able to go straight from draw- ing to mould/tool in-house is a blessing. Wherever possible we prefer to build


from female tools, keeping fairing to a minimum, and the vast majority of these were machined from PET foam which is a recycled product. All in all a very enjoyable build. And the


results speak for themselves. Gavin Tappenden, Composite Craft, Cowes


q


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130