search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Building a boat


Gavin Tappenden’s Composite Craft has only ever built one 5.5 Metre and David Hollom has only ever designed one – but the combination’s first co-operation in a Metre boat class swept the board at this year’s international regattas including taking a maiden world championship title. Now the phones have started to ring…


When Peter Morton (Morty) rang me to ask if Composite Craft might be interested in building a 5.5 Metre I found myself saying yes almost before he’d finished ask- ing the question. Such is the rarity of this type of project, and the chance to work with Dave Hollom again assured me we weren’t wasting our time. We’ve worked with Dave a lot over the years, producing many championship-winning boats and


42 SEAHORSE


foils that he has designed. And this was to be a proper campaign with multiple design candidates along with CFD and VPP studies. So while all that was going on we got our teeth into what makes a 5.5m tick. Morty had been competing in the 5.5m


class for a while, so we had access to his older boat to see the scale of the under - taking and the way the sailors interact with the systems onboard. The more infor- mation we were able to glean early on the clearer it made the key decisions on how we were going to build the boat. The first question was easy – all of the


modern 5.5 Metres are built in epoxy/glass foam sandwich construction. This offers the best stiffness-to-weight ratio without going to honeycomb cores which are prohibited by the class rules. There are many ways to build a boat.


Some, like planking over male frames or moulding over male plugs, yield quick results but accuracy will be lost in the building and fairing process. The scale of the inaccuracy depends on the skill on the shopfloor and the expertise of the builder.


Having been involved in America’s Cup


builds when using male plugs accuracies of around 2mm on a 26m boat were deemed acceptable. Dave kindly relayed to us that the paint thickness on the 5.5m was likely to equal around 8kg of displacement, so the possible errors in displacement for male moulded structures could be large. Too large, in fact, for an accurate build


to the very tight displacement target to which Dave had designed the boat. His first 5.5m design was to utilise minimum displacement/minimum sail area on a long waterline. Any extra sinkage of the hull would equate to extra waterline length and therefore take the boat out of class. We’ve always worked to the mantra


that it is the builder’s job to build the boat drawn, not to interpolate or leave the materials used in control of the shape of the boat. That’s a thing of the past. We therefore decided to employ female tools which were taken from CNC-cut plugs. The company we chose to undertake


this work has a great deal of experience in high-accuracy tooling; we were satisfied to


ROBERT DEAVES


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130