search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
It was not so many years ago when many of the world’s fastest and most spectacular racing yachts would travel to Cowes Week as a matter of course – and not only in Fastnet years. This is Skandia Wild Thing on a visit to the UK threading through the traffic past Cowes Green as she dodges the building ebb tide. At this year’s event the biggest boats were down around 45ft, with a similar trend at the Copa del Rey in Palma. Once again the biggest yachts are today more interested in racing offshore where they do not need a crew counted in the dozens. Meanwhile, the Cape 31s are bleeding inshore fleets of the most competitive teams – owners also tiring of dragging around expensive, heavy interiors that are rarely used except after racing on a rainy day


under ORC, I see similar trends. This year just three out of the 18 boats in ORC 1 were younger than 10 years, none in ORC 2, four of the 21 in ORC 3, and one of the seven in ORC 4. Across the four classes just two boats on the podium were younger than 10 years: Scugnizza, an Italia 11.98 launched in 2019, and the J/99 Meerblick Fun dating from 2018. Both scored a first in class, though, which could indicate a trend difference from IRC. Or perhaps they are just well sailed?


If I may suggest two areas for the rating managers to look at firstly would be whether and how to promote fewer crew… Certainly in IRC the maximum crew number, even if tied to the weight limit, seems (too) generous.


Secondly to look at the age allowance that is designed to encour- age older boats to keep racing by keeping them more competitive. I certainly would not like to find older boats rated out of the game, but today we see money being poured into the older boats to opti- mise perfectly everything that does not affect the age allowance – I feel that correcting that trend (in small steps) will be advisable. In a way if rated racing, certainly for day racing, is to be interesting, it requires one-off boats and with that the fun of planning, designing, building and then optimising your personally tailored yacht. As soon as that is not there and we rely on production boats for day racing, one-design racing is a good alternative, obviously finan- cially but also from a sporting perspective, as well as the fact that focusing on offshore racing becomes even more rewarding. There is no way that owning and building one-off boats for inshore racing in the sub-50ft range, probably soon below 60ft, will return. Day racing must find its future in embracing one-design classes. Rated competition below 60ft will then continue to develop towards optimising existing boats, the classics of the future. All in all Covid and now also the war in Ukraine have further pushed down competitor numbers in Europe. A recession, not that unlikely, might cause more havoc. Not for this year’s Maxi Yacht Rolex Cup, though, with 50 entries and about half of them over 80ft in length, pushing new boundaries. Perhaps the fantastic images of the Maxi’s racing in Sardinia may help to inspire other boat owners to pick up racing (again)…


Cherry on this year’s Maxi Yacht Rolex Cup publicity cake is the much hyped first competitive outing by Flying Nikka. But is it really? Just as in Andersen’s tale of the emperor’s new clothes, are we not watching a naked emperor as Flying Nikka – for reasons of safety as well as fair competition – has a start of her own; in reality she is not racing but showcasing what could be a future Maxi class? Equally interesting is the first competitive outing of the first Club- Swan 80 My Song, this one competing for real and taking on a strong fleet of Maxis… most of them 5-18ft longer. Pity the Maxi 72s are not in the same start, leaving us to guess true performance somewhat as well as sporting hierarchy in the 2022 Maxi fleet. All involved with the ClubSwan 80 project were understandably relieved to see their baby fly downwind in medium breeze at the same speed as the much bigger Wally Centos. Also to see her finish her first race in third place knowing that upwind there is still plenty of room to improve; her centreline rotating canard is not fully func- tioning yet and tweaking stability remains an important option. My Song has a generous rig amounting to very much the same sail area as the 3ft longer and near 5-tonne heavier Deep Blue! No wonder this swan flies like an eagle, to borrow Steve Miller’s famous song title. Miller certainly was not referring to sail area to displace- ment ratio, however… Two very interesting debuts showing lots of potential. Who can ask for more? Rob Weiland, TP52 Class Manager


 SEAHORSE 29


The HCP pump panel is characterised by its convenience, power and compact design. It allows up to four functions to be controlled centrally and precisely. Just a single movement is all that is required to change between the functions and adjust and control the uniquely powerful hydraulic output of up to 440 bar. The HCP pump panel is also visually appealing with high quality materials, CNC-machined components and fronts, which are available in a choice of stainless steel, aluminium or carbon. The panel is also easy to connect using plug-in tank connectors.


WWW.RECKMANN.COM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130