search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Update


It shows the pace of learning with the foiling Imocas that big changes were still being made to boats in the final months before the start of the Vendée. Several boats have been ‘fattened up’ in the bow to help with take-offs and landings off the foils, with Charlie Dalin and designer Guillaume Verdier taking a particularly obvious approach when they chopped up TJV winner Apivia. Jumping up on the foils a few seconds earlier and landing more softly will produce big gains over an 80-day race. This is not a time for subtlety


THE FASCINATION OF SIN – Jack Griffin We now have both New York Yacht Club American Magic and Team New Zealand sailing their AC75s in Auckland, soon to be joined by the other two challengers, Luna Rossa and Ineos Team UK. American Magic promptly joined the capsize club. As on ETNZ’s


Te Aihe last December, no one was injured, Defiant was promptly righted and, after a systems and rig check, carried on sailing. Thankfully, this is a far cry from the destruction of Oracle’s first


AC72 when they pitchpoled on San Francisco Bay and then were washed five miles outside the Golden Gate on their ninth day of sailing in 2012. Both AC75 capsizes were relatively mild affairs, much less dramatic than some wipeouts on conventional monohulls, according to skipper Terry Hutchinson. As we get closer to the first AC75 racing in December, there is


no shortage of criticism of the AC75 concept as having nothing to do with most people’s sailing and being too expensive and complex. Critics point to the paucity of challengers to make their point. But these critics don’t understand that the America’s Cup has always been a unique sporting event rather than a regatta. As Dennis Conner said in 1985, ‘If it were just about sailing it wouldn’t be the America’s Cup.’ When America crossed the Atlantic she first put in at Le Havre


for three weeks of refitting and getting into racing trim. She also took on supplies, including an impressive quantity of French wine. From its earliest days the social events have been a key element


of the America’s Cup mystique. Technology rather than sailing skill almost always provides the winning edge. America’s long, sharp bow, her heavily raked masts and her lack of a foretopmast all surprised the British yachtsmen. Sometimes the social events outweighed the racing. Lieutenant


William Henn’s 1886 challenger Galatea was more cruiser than racer. Henn’s wife furnished Galatea’s saloon sumptuously, to the amusement of the New York yachtsmen who visited onboard. The Henns were very popular throughout the social season in New York but Galatea was soundly beaten by Mayflower. Yacht design took on much more importance in the following match. Secrecy and intrigue became watchwords during the run-up to the 1887 match when the first skirts for an America’s Cup challenger


14 SEAHORSE


appeared – almost 100 years before Australia II. George L Watson designed the Scottish challenger Thistle. Only the designer, owner and workmen were allowed to observe the construction, and the workmen were sworn to secrecy – sort of a 19th-century NDA. Thistle was skirted while being launched. After she was afloat


skirts still hid everything above the waterline. As with Australia II there was much interest in Thistle’s keel. Reports speculated (incor- rectly) that she had a centreboard. The New York World newspaper hired a diver who produced (very inaccurate) drawings. Gordon Bennett’s New York Heraldoutdid their rival and hired a draughtsman who managed to get a look at the boat when it was out of the water. After Thistle arrived in New York enterprising boatmen charged up to $3 a head to row people around the Scottish yacht. Thistle also opened another chapter of America’s Cup intrigue


– the measurement dispute. Her waterline measured in 18in longer than specified in the challenge. The press made much of this but the NYYC simply added five seconds to the time allowance for their Defender, Volunteer. After the 1887 Volunteer vs Thistlematch we had six matches won by Herreshoff designs, including Reliance. That era was followed by the J Class and then the 12 Metre Class. Match racing in the 12s was spirited and dramatic, but they were hardly the fastest yachts on the planet. When the design rule for the International America’s Cup Class was developed during 1989- 90 the objectives included making the boats longer, lighter and faster. The five matches in the IACC were bookended by two Deed of Gift matches, both won by wing-sailed multihulls. The 1988 and 2010 matches brought the America’s Cup back its tradition of high-tech yachts designed only to try to win one regatta. And now we have the AC75s to entertain us. In 1935 Charles Burgess made the observation that inspired


the title of Bob Fisher’s encyclopaedic work on Cup history: ‘The modern America’s Cup racer bears not the slightest resemblance to any useful craft in the world, and she does not even contribute to the development of yachting as a true sport apart from the satisfaction of an illogical national vanity. But, having damned them, I must confess to an absorbing interest in the problems set by those extraordinary craft. They have the fascination of sin.’ The AC75s are nothing if not fascinating. Let’s enjoy the spectacle! www.cupexperience.com


NICOLAS PEHE/DPPI


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118