search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
IRC


The customers


I had lunch the other day with my good friend Johan Tuvstedt, an excellent sailor and measurer, while he was chairing the technical committee at the recent World Sailing Double Handed Offshore Championships in Cowes. Johan has a uniquely broad perspective on rating systems: he sits on both the IRC Congress and several ORC committees, and is also involved in a range of Scandinavian local rating and handicap systems. That gave us opportunity to look at the world of rating in a broader sense. Johan is not just a rules and measuring man either, his racing


record speaks for itself, with Jolene, his longtime sailing partner Fredrik Rydin’s J/121, taking 1st in the 2025 ORC Double Handed European Championships, 1st in the 2024 IRC Two-Handed class in the Roschier Baltic Sea Race, 3rd in the 2022 ORC Double Handed Worlds and 9th in the 2021 Rolex Fastnet Race among his many good results. Over lunch our talk soon drifted from boats to family. Johan told


me about his wife’s project developing a digital meeting place for elderly people in Sweden, encouraging social companionship. In building the system she works with ‘personas’ to help her picture the type of user, for example, Anna, an 80-year-old woman living alone who wants more social contact. It struck us both that this way of thinking applies just as well to rating systems. If we start by picturing different types of sailors or owners as


‘personas’, it becomes much easier to explain various rating systems and what the market really needs. So let’s give it a try and look at each type of owner in turn. (Disclaimer, these personas are not real and do not refer to any individual in sailing... honestly).


40 SEAHORSE So first we have Barry ‘Back-of-the-Beer-Mat’ Thompson. Barry’s


weapon of choice is a 1980s cruiser-racer, something like a Moody 34 with sails older than most of his crew. He thrives under the local sailing club’s empirical handicap system, where results are based on last week’s performance and if he bought the handicapper a pint. He considers weighing the boat an act of sacrilege and is convinced that ‘sail area’ is just a conspiracy dreamt up by sailmakers to sell him more Dacron. So Barry is a prime candidate for a handicap system. To be clear,


a handicap system adjusts a boat’s results based on observed past performance rather than precise measurements of the boat itself; essentially, the rating is tweaked depending on how fast (or slow) the boat actually sails in real races and so is as much a reflection on the skill of the crew. These systems are typically ‘yardstick’ style, where the goal is


to level the playing field across a very diverse fleet. Examples include PHRF in North America, ECHO in Ireland, RYA NHC (recently replaced by YTC) in the UK, and PHS in Australia and New Zealand. For Barry this means that he can compete fairly with newer, faster boats without needing to submit detailed measurements or invest in cutting-edge equipment. He just shows up, sails and lets the system sort out his results. Next in the personas we have Monica ‘Measuring-Tape’ Müller.


Monica sails a tidy 35-footer, something like a Oceanis 35, and is happy with rating systems that involve a few straightforward measurements: hull dimensions, sail dimensions and that’s about it. She can be found on the dock with a tape measure, carefully


PHIL UHL


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104