BETTER CHANGE STATESIDE
impact on their job. Is it ethical to employ someone who has previously self-excluded from working in gaming?
• Treatment Gaps: Self-exclusion programmes primarily focus on restricting access to gambling venues but may not address the underlying issues driving problem gambling. Should a comprehensive programme then include therapy and counselling as standard?
The effectiveness of self-exclusion programs in curbing problem gambling has been a topic of ongoing debate and research. While these programmes have shown positive outcomes for many individuals, they are not a one-size-fits-all solution. Several factors can influence their effectiveness: • Motivation: The individual’s level of motivation and commitment to change plays a significant role. Those who genuinely desire to take control and overcome their gambling harm are most likely to benefit from self-exclusion.
• Access to Alternatives: The availability of alternative gambling options can affect the success of self-exclusion. If individuals can easily find other ways to gamble, the programme’s impact may be limited.
• Supportive Resources: Self-exclusion programmes are most effective when they are part of a comprehensive treatment plan that includes counselling, therapy, and support groups. If an individual doesn’t use the time away from gambling productively, there is unlikely to be much long-term benefit.
• Duration: Longer self-exclusion periods are generally thought to be more effective, as they provide individuals with more time to address their addiction and develop healthier habits.
• Enforcement and Compliance: The effectiveness of self- exclusion relies on the programme’s enforcement and the individual’s compliance with the rules. Improved technology and collaboration between operators are far more likely to enhance enforcement.
• Stressors and Triggers: Addressing the underlying stressors and triggers that contribute to problem gambling is essential. Self-exclusion alone may not be enough if these issues remain unaddressed.
The purpose of our work will be to attempt to enhance the effectiveness of self-exclusion programmes and better support individuals suffering from gambling harm. In order to achieve that, several initiatives and improvements could be considered: • Increased Awareness: Operators will need to promote
awareness of self-exclusion programmes and their benefits through dedicated and personalised CRM to encourage individuals to seek help if they or someone they know is struggling with gambling.
• Enhanced Enforcement: Develop more robust mechanisms for enforcing self-exclusion, especially in the online gambling sector. Collaborate with industry stakeholders to share self-exclusion lists and prevent access.
• Extended Duration Options: Offer longer self-exclusion periods, perhaps including indefinite options for those who require ongoing support. This allows individuals to focus on recovery without the pressure of a looming end date.
• Comprehensive Treatment: Integrate self-exclusion into comprehensive treatment plans that include counselling, therapy, and support groups. Address the underlying psychological and emotional factors contributing to addiction.
• Privacy Protections: Ensure that individuals’ personal information is securely handled and protected. Implement stringent data security measures to address privacy concerns.
• Gambling Awareness Programs: Implement gambling awareness programmes within communities, schools, and workplaces to educate individuals about responsible gaming and the risks of problem gambling. Self-exclusion is clearly a valuable tool in the effort to combat
problem gambling and promote positive play. It provides individuals with a structured and supportive framework to regain control over their gambling habits, repair relationships, and rebuild their lives. While self-exclusion is not without its challenges and limitations, we are confident that by the end of our project, we’ll havea robust and comprehensive set of recommendations which protect both the player and the operator. It’s important to remember that self-exclusion is just one
part of a larger strategy to address problem gambling. To achieve lasting recovery, individuals should seek professional help, address underlying issues, and build a support network. Society, in turn, must continue to raise awareness about the risks of gambling addiction and ensure that resources and treatment options are readily available to those in need. By working together, we can create a safer and more responsible gambling environment for everyone.
OCTOBER 2023 37
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76
