search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
HYBRID PACKAGING MATERIALS


Michelman image: Michelman Introduces Nuvita® Life 4002 & Nuvita® Life 4605: Bio-Based Barrier Coatings for Paper Packaging Applications


Fermtech CEO Andy Clayton


The answer, however, cannot be


determined by looking at the product in isolation. A shorter shelf life can affect retailer inventory practices, distribution models and supply-chain complexity, potentially creating operational challenges further down the value chain. This is where the promise of mono-


material packaging becomes particularly interesting. Rather than relying on a


collection of different materials,


developers are looking at ways of building the necessary functionality into a simpler structure, whether


through coatings


applied directly to paper or functional layers within mono-material films. “Mono-material packaging is becoming


increasingly important due to regulatory developments and growing demand for improved recyclability,” Anna says. The objective is straightforward: maximise the proportion of packaging that can enter a single recycling stream without sacrificing the performance that made the original multi-layer structure necessary in the first place. Starch-based coatings are one route


being explored. Cargill’s modified starch technologies are designed to provide oil and grease resistance using standard


34 • KENNEDY’S CONFECTION • JULY 2026


paper-coating equipment, potentially allowing functional performance


be added without introducing another substantial material layer. Hydrocolloids, meanwhile, are opening


another avenue. Pectin and carrageenan are attracting attention for oxygen barrier applications, while bio-based waxes are being considered where moisture resistance is the primary requirement. Anna cautions that the industry is not


yet at the point where these emerging materials can universally replace conventional plastic-based barriers. “Most emerging solutions still require


further optimization before they can consistently match the full performance range of conventional plastic-based structures across all confectionery applications,” she says. That caveat is important because


packaging performance is not determined by barrier properties alone. Sealing and machinability can be just as critical, particularly in an industry where products are packed at high speeds and even small changes to packaging behaviour can affect line efficiency. Sealing, in particular, remains one of the more difficult hurdles for bio-based structures. A material can


to


deliver the required oxygen, grease or moisture barrier but still fall short when it needs to form a reliable heat seal. This is creating an important role for


hybrid packaging. Rather than attempting to remove every synthetic component, packaging developers can retain a thin synthetic layer where it provides a specific function – such as reliable sealing – while using bio-based materials elsewhere in the structure to provide barrier performance. “In these structures, bio-based materials may provide


sealing and packaging line


barrier


performance in the inner layers while a thin synthetic layer is retained to ensure reliable


efficiency,” says Anna. The approach reflects a broader shift in


the way packaging sustainability is being considered. Rather than treating material reduction as an end in itself, the objective is increasingly to optimise the entire structure around its performance. For manufacturers considering a


move away from conventional multilayer packaging, Cargill identifies four considerations: product protection, sealing and machinability, regulatory compliance and future readiness, and


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44