search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FOOD & BEVERAGE  AUDITCOMPLY


Time for a paper cut – the rise of digitised quality and compliance


For highly regulated markets such as food manufacturing, there is no room for error when it comes to safety, quality and compliance


By Richard Wilson, Marketing Manager, Nulogy B


ut, for the many businesses in the sector still relying on pen and paper systems to manage food safety and quality assurance


 inaccuracies is high. Richard Wilson, Marketing Manager for Nulogy, looks at the future of fool- proof compliance and quality management. According to recent research, 49 per cent of


UK businesses are still operating a physical paper , and while for non-manufacturing companies the consequences of this may be limited to inconvenience, for highly regulated industries such as food and beverage, the   Aside from the obvious potential for human


error, there is also the impact on audit, recall or investigation responses. Using a paper system  penalties and operational disruption if there  for these scenarios, alongside potentially unfair reputational damage if the available paperwork does not accurately represent the systems in place.


THE NEED TO SCALE AND STANDARDISE  standardise. For fast growing food brands operating and launching multiple sites, the manual documentation of FSQA processes can make it near-impossible to ensure consistency across all facilities, and the opportunity to compare data between sites is lost. While manufacturers using these systems


are likely well aware of the challenges of pen and paper, the possibility of transitioning to a digital solution may seem unrealistic in relation to the complexity of existing processes and the amount of information which would need to be transferred, potentially preventing them from making the leap.


SUPPORTING A TRANSITION TO DIGITALISATION However, while large-scale system change may seem daunting, the reality is that the right specialist provider can make the transition painless, retaining existing processes in a digital format and providing support throughout the development and implementation of the new system.


For Sysco Corporation, the world’s largest


foodservice distributor, digitalising FSQA transformed operations, increased yield, improved quality and provided total compliance visibility.


SYSCO SPECIALTY MEAT GROUP – A CASE STUDY Serving over 620,000 customer locations in the food and hospitality sectors across the UK, U.S., Canada, and beyond, Sysco operates over 330 distribution facilities generating annual revenues exceeding US$50 billion. The Specialty Meat & Seafood (SSMG) division


provides high-quality, fresh and frozen meat and seafood products, and, along with the entire Sysco portfolio, roots its commitment to food safety in a  However, its reliance on traditional paper- based processes for food safety and quality  data inconsistencies. Manual records were prone to loss or damage, complicating compliance and data integrity, while the lack of real-time visibility hindered proactive issue resolution and performance improvement.


ENHANCING DATA, COMPLIANCE AND TRANSPARENCY To address these challenges, Sysco appointed Belfast-based AuditComply, part of purpose-built software for external manufacturing provider Nulogy, to streamline operations, enhance data accuracy, ensure regulatory compliance and to meet consumer demands for better transparency. A fully automated FSQA framework, from Metal  more, was implemented using customisable audit templates, along with the creation of a centralised document repository for ease of traceability. This


16 November/December 2025 Irish Manufacturing


centralisation, along with real time analytics and  more informed decisions on both a site-by-site and big picture basis as well as ensuring traceability.


MULTI-PLANT MONITORING AuditComply’s purpose-built system also provided the capability for multi-plant monitoring, including  consistent practices across all facilities, whilst accommodating individual site requirements. Additionally, real time alerts and structured NC/  to critical control point deviations, allowing for effective incident management. Supplier portals and raw material assessments


were built into the management system, facilitating collaboration, reducing non-compliance costs and enhancing supplier quality and accountability, resulting in savings of over $4M annually via improved raw material claim backs. SSMG is just one example, alongside businesses such as Bushmills and Lakeland Dairies, of how manufacturers can not only improve quality, safety and risk management in their operations but make  management software.


DELIVERING COMPLIANCE FOR FOOD MANUFACTURERS AND BEYOND With ever more stringent regulations and growing consumer demand for transparency, working alongside software businesses like AuditComply  manufacturers, delivering effortless compliance and quality assurance as well as providing the opportunity to make data driven decisions which optimise operations and assist in scaling. https://www.auditcomply.com/


www.irish-manufacturing.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44