ATEX EQUIPMENT & EXPLOSION SAFETY SCHEDULED FOR
ATEX MAINTENANCE: BUREAU VERITAS HIGHLIGHTS THE VALUE
OF PLANNED PREVENTATIVE MAINTEANCE A
s the UK eases its way out of COVID-19 restrictions, Bureau Veritas is reminding plant managers and duty holders responsible for explosive
(Ex) equipment to ensure they are taking a proactive approach when it comes to essential maintenance works. With coronavirus putting pressure on
available resource for activities such as Ex inspections (also known as ‘ATEX inspections’) over the last 18 months, it is imperative that the appointed responsible persons, or Technical Person with Executive Function (TPEF), responsible for hazardous areas is clear on the maintenance requirements in line with the Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations (DSEAR). According to Electrical
Installations Inspection and Maintenance (specifically standard BS EN 60079-17), Ex equipment must be inspected at one of three grades at a minimum of every
three years to ensure it remains safe and compliant in line with the relevant standards, local regulations and the manufacturer instructions. With many operations taking a ‘visual’ or ‘close’ approach to ensuring the safety of their Ex equipment, Bureau Veritas is encouraging those working in hazardous environment to take a proactive and ‘Planned Preventative Maintenance’ (PPM) approach to ensure compliance and to reduce the likelihood of an ignition source. Michael Kenyon, head of Electrical
Technical Development at Bureau Veritas, says: “As we emerge from lockdown and we begin to revisit processes and procedures that may have been put on hold in the last 18 months, it’s important that those responsible for Ex equipment are aware of the ATEX requirements and are planning accordingly for their maintenance programmes. “By the nature of the industries that
operate with hazardous areas, all too often we see visual or close inspections observed, with no consideration towards a more detailed inspection. This can sometimes be the case for long periods of time, or even during the entire lifecycle of the equipment. Where protection concepts have ignition capabilities, consideration to prioritising these types of inspections is recommended, and further demonstrates the effort of compliance.
“Having a PPM strategy can ensure
that inspections are scheduled ahead of time and on a regular basis; particularly important for plants that require 24/7 functionality and operate with aging assets. It also means budgets can be better managed should equipment require further maintenance works – far preferable than operating on a reactive management plan.” In the UK, statutory regulations –
including DSEAR and Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) – place responsibilities on Duty Holders to ensure equipment is maintained adequately for businesses that process or storage flammable gases and vapours and explosive materials such as fine dusts. Kenyon continues: “It is essential for all
operations that include hazardous areas to have in place a suitable inspection strategy. We often see businesses carry out an important initial inspection and, further down the line, they become more infrequent – ultimately becoming an expensive, and dangerous, problem. “Complying with regulations can be a
minefield, and it can be a complex matter. As such we often see the TPEF turning to Bureau Veritas to support in providing essential ATEX guidance and management – whether that is to provide independent assurance that ATEX and DSEAR requirements are met, to carry out risk assessment, gap analysis or even specialist DSEAR training.” Bureau Veritas has produced a
technical guide to support Duty Holders in understanding how to develop an effective strategy to reduce the risk and achieve compliance when working in potentially explosive atmospheres. To download the free guide, visit
https://share.hsforms.com/19NbXSdvoQ O2-tagD8QxlmQ2z02a.
Bureau Veritas
www.bureauveritas.co.uk
20 WINTER 2021 | INDUSTRIAL COMPLIANCE
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48
