search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FEATURE GAS DETECTION


Implementing critical protections


A


or feedstocks must deploy a comprehensive strategy to prevent, detect, and fight fires. Such systems must be designed and installed by experts in compliance with applicable standards. This basic concept is in use every day, but becomes complex when the relevant standards are unclear or provide insufficient information. The expert and company must then fill in blanks, which may lead to misunderstandings and potential disagreements when the authority having jurisdiction inspects the system. Are such situations still possible today? Could


when a standard is silent Combustible gas detectors are a critical part of a fire protection system, but a key standard has very little to say on the topic. How can a company resolve this issue and remain compliant? Emerson’s Nick Pinto investigates


ny process manufacturing plant handling large volumes of flammable liquid products


any detail still remain undefined after following standards for so many years in so many areas? The answer is yes, and here is a case in point: installing combustible gas detectors as part of a fire detection and suppression system. Let us dig into this situation. NFPA 72: National Fire Alarm and Signaling


Code is normally used by system designers and inspectors in conjunction with NFPA 70:


National Electrical Code. But an inspector wanting to evaluate use of combustible gas detectors has little to go on because NFPA 72, 17.10 Gas Detection is a very short section in the long chapter on initiating devices. How should gas detectors fit into the picture to ensure compliance?


COMBUSTIBLE GAS DETECTOR FUNCTIONS A combustible gas detector looks for escaping gases (propane, methane, etc.) and vapours of flammable liquids (gasoline, ethanol, etc.), hopefully before they find an ignition source. There are several detection technologies, each with its own capabilities and designed to perform a specific type of task. When used in combination, they complement each other to provide thorough, overlapping detection coverage. Fixed point combustible gas detectors are


Figure 1: Fixed point detectors, such as Emerson’s Net Safety Millennium product family, are normally placed close to likely sources.


28 WINTER 2020 | INDUSTRIAL COMPLIANCE


the most common (Figure 1) and use one of two sensor technologies. Infrared sensors respond to the specific light wavelengths absorbed by the vapour or gas. Catalytic bead sensors facilitate an internal chemical reaction in the presence of a variety of gases and vapours, both hydrocarbon- and nonhydrocarbon-based. Both technologies depend on a cloud with sufficient concentration drifting to the individual sensor.


Figure 2: Open path detectors provide a protective “fence” around equipment.


Fixed point detectors are usually deployed where there is a concentration of equipment, and therefore multiple potential release points. Open path combustible gas detectors send a


focused beam of infrared light from a transmitter to a receiver (see Figure 2 above) to detect combustible gases moving through the beam. These cover a wider area than a fixed-point detector, and are therefore deployed like a fence around the perimeter of tanks and equipment clusters. Ultrasonic gas leak detectors listen for the


characteristic sounds made by pressurised gas leaks in frequencies above audible range (Figure 3). Using multiple piezoelectric sensors, they can respond very quickly. However, they respond to any pressurised gas, so they cannot differentiate between escaping propane and a compressed air leak, for example.


MINIMALIST STANDARD An NFPA standard is not intended to be a design manual; however, it must provide sufficient information for an inspector to look at an installation and make an intelligent evaluation as to compliance. Presumably, inspectors have basic expertise, so the actual standard text serves primarily to clarify critical details. However, in the case of combustible gas detectors, NFPA 72, 17.10 is sparse by any


/ INDUSTRIALCOMPLIANCE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44