News: Rochester Electronics
Component misalignment misadventures
Rochester Electronics emphasises that effective obsolescence management starts at the design phase by choosing components and architectures that align with the long-term system’s lifecycle to avoid premature redesigns and mitigate market, architecture, and board design misalignments.
U
nderstanding the risks associated with component selection during the design and product definition phases requires a deep understanding of the
timeline for long-term system development and when components are introduced by the semiconductor company. Market misalignment occurs when a long-term system is designed using short-term market products or already mature products. Architecture misalignment happens when the choice of processor architecture is clearly close to the end of life, usually when the cost of architectural change has postponed an inevitable future. Board design misalignment results after board layouts are done with knowingly, densely packed, shifting commodity products. Component selection during development is a deciding factor for potential premature product redesigns and requalification. Component choices are frequently influenced by the ongoing progress of product development, with the aim to maximize the potential of older software and hardware solutions. Market misalignment: There are times when the easy or most efficient component selection is the wrong choice, due to market misalignment. This scenario could be feasible if there is a planned and budgeted last-time purchase within a few years of selecting the components, however, this is seldom the situation. For example, graphic driver products have a very short lifetime in comparison to military or commercial avionics displays. Opting for a PC-oriented component in a market where the sole purpose of those components is product development will lead to obsolescence even before the first production units are shipped for long-term systems. When it comes to choosing a graphics driver product upfront, it is crucial to consider the long-term system cost and allocate a budget for an early last-time- buy. This is necessary to safeguard military or commercial avionics displays and avoid obsolescence in a market where PC-oriented
6 June 2024
components may not meet the requirements of product development. Architecture misalignment: Commercial avionics has long settled on the PowerPC processor multi-core architecture, due to the control for multi-core operation and speculative execution across multiple processor cores. The existing multi-core PowerPC products have been certified for commercial avionics and software development is proven. However, the end of the PowerPC architecture is on the horizon. It is only a matter of time before the commercial avionics market adopts ARM or RISCV as their architectures. Every single PowerPC-based product being designed today is already on a processor product line that is over a decade old.
Board design misalignment: There is always the temptation to pack DRAM as tightly as possible. Many systems have variable amounts of DRAM, to enhance their product or to provide tiers within a product family. Packing that DRAM into as small of a space as possible could be an advantage. However, the challenge with long-term systems lasting 15-20 years is that DRAM technology will evolve significantly within that time. It is crucial to anticipate this change by strategically
Components in Electronics
designing board layouts upfront, minimizing needs for future modifications. Market misalignment: Memory products are designed for short-term systems. The largest memory suppliers no longer stock DDR3. Coincidently, DDR3 is the primary memory type supported by the latest PowerPC product. Designing long- term systems without a long-term memory product plan upfront is an issue. Memory has been a fast-moving product for decades. Memory innovations come at a rapid pace to keep up with data centre demands and portable product demands. Long-term systems are a market misalignment with all memory types because all memory types are short-term products.
Key questions to consider:
● What is the component’s lifecycle status across the application’s lifetime?
● Are the key components of the design comprehensively documented?
● Can the true design files (VHDL, Verilog, Spice-Models, Constraints, Source Test-
Vectors) be archived at the design phase to offer a chance of rebuild if the unexpected happens?
● Does the design contain proprietary intellectual property? If so, the ability to “port” such designs when the components are made obsolete may be compromised, or subject to relicensing and royalties. From Rochester Electronics’ experience, many companies do almost none of this planning for long-term systems in the design phases where the impact would be maximized. From component selection, all the way through IP block selection, there are many ways a long-term system company can mitigate risk and schedule for system longevity. Ultimately, partnering with Rochester Electronics to ensure long-term system availability is the best solution.
Find out more:
www.rocelec.com
www.cieonline.co.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60
