OIL & GAS FEATURE


Roger Highton, product line manager at Eaton for MTL Process Connectivity Products, provides some insights into designing for functional safety in process control applications, such as those found in the oil & gas industry


S


afety is a key consideration in the design and specification of equipment


for use in any industrial application. In processing environments, where potentially flammable gases and dust are constantly present, it is particularly important to understand how to design out risk as far as possible. The way we consider safety and respond


to risk have changed over time, influenced by incidents like Buncefield. While there are clear regulations which require compliance, there is also recognition that functional safety - a ‘best practice’ approach which considers how safety is managed as a whole - can be effective in reducing risk. Demonstrating compliance with both the engineering and management aspects of functional safety standards provides auditable evidence that due measures are in place. Functional Safety relates to the part of


overall safety that depends upon the correct operation of an electrical, electronic, or programmable electronic safety instrumented system (SIS). The requirements for such a SIS are defined in the IEC 61508 group of standards. These include an umbrella standard as well as separate standards for different industries, including processing. Essentially, functional safety applies


wherever electrical & electronic products are used in safety and protection systems, where overall safety depends on equipment or a system operating correctly in response to its inputs. For example, using a thermal sensor in the windings of an electric motor to de-energise the motor before they can overheat is an instance of functional safety. Functional safety cannot be determined


without considering systems as a whole and the environment with which they interact. As such, functional safety standards have much in common with quality standards, in that they require compliant companies to specify and adopt a systematic and auditable approach that regulates the full lifecycle of the SIS. IEC 61508:2010 defines safety as “freedom from unacceptable risk”. For


/ PROCESS&CONTROL EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT RISK


Incorporating products made by a certified FSM company is a


contributing factor in ensuring that safety instrumented systems are fully compliant


process plant owners, compliance requires a systematic appraisal of risk within their process operations and to define criteria for the acceptability of these risks. Risk levels can be mitigated by either reducing the frequency of a hazardous event, or by minimising the consequences. Measures of controlling risk, including


Good Engineering Practice (GEP) and Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA), are recognised reduction measures. Once existing protection layers have been taken into account, further reductions in risk may be achieved through the implementation of safety instrumented systems. The emphasis here is on “the correct functioning of a safety instrumented system”. Safety instrumented systems are distinct


The 4500 and 5500 range of intrinsically-safe isolators easily integrates with the I/O equipment of all major instrumentation and DCS suppliers


from process control systems. They are designed to provide a final protection layer to prevent harm if a hazardous event occurs. Whereas a process control system is designed to operate continually, a SIS is required to operate infrequently, with a high and predictable probability of success. Accurate specification at the outset and regular testing throughout its lifetime are key to ensuring that a SIS will fulfil its function. Key questions are: What


is the SIS protecting against? What would the consequences be should the SIS fail? In functional safety terms, it is the end


user’s responsibility to ensure that any SIS are fit for purpose, have the correct performance characteristics and are maintained and managed correctly. Equipment suppliers also have responsibilities to ensure their equipment is assessed according to the functional safety standards and provide the Functional Safety Manual containing all the data required by the user to determine if it is suitable for the application. Also, many functional safety applications


are used in processes where there is a risk of hazardous gases or dust being present, requiring suitable certification of the installed equipment. One way of doing so is to use products that are intrinsically safe (IS): designed and certified to be incapable of releasing sufficient electrical or thermal energy - under normal or abnormal conditions - to cause ignition. Whilst IS equipment is widely used in process applications, the requirement for both IS and functional safety approvals is limited to the signals used for safety and fire & gas systems. To give SIS specifiers and end users full


peace of mind, Eaton MTL is certified as a Functional Safety Management (FSM) company. Therefore, when Eaton design and manufacture MTL products for use in functional safety-related systems, both the design processes and products comply with IEC 61508:2010. The range of MTL products assessed as


suitable for use in a functional safety context includes wiring components, signal conditioning and interface components, signal surge protection products, asset management instrumentation and alarm annunciators.


Eaton MTL www.mtl-inst.com/ mtl_group/about_mtl_group/fsm


PROCESS & CONTROL | OCTOBER 2019 25


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52