search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TEST & MEASUREMENT


Choosing the Best Reflow Process for PCBA: Convection vs. Vapour phase


Joe Booth, Altus Group CEO I


n the intricate landscape of electronics manufacturing, every step in the production process holds the utmost importance. Precision, efficiency, and reliability are the foundation of a finished product’s success. Among the many decisions the manufacturer faces are selecting the optimal reflow soldering method, which occupies a vital space. At Altus Group, we are often at the centre of those discussions, advising customers on key considerations and potential pitfalls. Here, we share valuable insight on how to decide on reflow process optimisation.


Two prominent reflow methods emerge within our extensive portfolio: Vapour Phase Reflow and Convection Reflow. Both can be great investments, offering unique benefits that match specific applications better than others and even catering to specific needs through options with or without a vacuum environment. We believe that the processes are synergistic and supplementary to one another and many of the top CEMs in the UK have both processes. However, what about cases where you can only pick one or the other? There are some key factors to consider, which are as follows.


Vapour Phase Reflow-Precision in Thermal Uniformity


Vapour Phase Reflow attains unparalleled thermal uniformity as it immerses the entire assembly in vapour. This method guarantees the even distribution of heat. The fluid’s boiling point is a natural thermostat, meticulously regulating temperatures to prevent components from experiencing excessive heat. Crucially, Vapour Phase Reflow excels in


oxygen-free environments, mitigating oxidation risks, and it is the torchbearer in intricate soldering tasks, particularly on high-density boards where precision is the name of the game. Moreover, its energy-efficient attributes contribute to environmental sustainability. Yet, it’s incumbent upon manufacturers to bear in mind the initial setup costs, which can be relatively higher depending on unit selection, along with the periodic need for fluid replenishment with Galden. While cycle times may be longer than convection reflow, Vapour Phase Reflow provides consistent, high-quality results.


Convection Reflow-Versatility and Scalability


Conversely, Convection Reflow is widely adopted in the industry, making finding technicians with expertise in its operation easier. Contemporary convection ovens offer a range of heating and cooling zones, allowing manufacturers to control the soldering profile precisely. This method excels in throughput, making it well-suited for large-scale production. Moreover, regarding initial expenses, convection ovens generally tread on the more affordable side. However, convection heating can pose challenges in achieving uniform heat distribution, especially on the most densely populated boards.


Convection reflow can also be more energy- intensive, but recent models have improved insulation and energy utilisation significantly. While potential oxidation exposure exists, with N2 options available, it remains manageable through due diligence and a non-issue for many UK & Irish Manufacturers. When pitted


against Vapour Phase Reflow, the variable heat intensities in zones demand a more profiling oversight, ensuring components retain their integrity and solder performance at its highest.


Considerations for Making the Right Choice


Production Volume: The scale of production often dictates the choice, with smaller batches favouring Vapour Phase Reflow for its precision, while Convection Reflow is ideal for high- volume scenarios. Board Complexity: The intricacy and component density of the board are important factors, regardless of throughput requirements. Budget Constraints: A thorough evaluation of immediate and long-term budgetary constraints is essential. Future Adaptability: Given the rapid pace of technological advancements in electronics, the system’s ability to adapt to future changes is a critical consideration.


Navigating the Complex Journey It is crucial to emphasise that while theoretical knowledge provides a solid foundation, real-world experience is invaluable. Altus recommends and offers application testing to align with unique needs. Choosing the right reflow soldering process involves many factors. Those contract manufacturers that are interested, should also explore the opportunity to invest in both processes at the same time and certainly have both on their technological road map, they may be surprised about the affordability as many of our partners have been.


MARCH 2024 | ELECTRONICS FOR ENGINEERS


45


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54