search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Monitoring & metering Improving the quality control of


process water F


In this article, Bürkert’s Greg Wainhouse considers ways to improve reverse osmosis monitoring and extend reliability


ood and beverage manufacturers use reverse osmosis to purify process water, which may originally come from either the mains supply or a


borehole. In either case, the objective is to produce a consistently high-quality water supply for the manufacturing process. Sampling and testing of the water is crucial to achieving this, so improving accuracy and consistency has major benefits. Reverse osmosis (RO) uses pressure to force water through a membrane leaving salts and dissolved solids behind. The process delivers consistently high-quality


water, provided the membranes do not become blocked or breached, allowing impurities to pass through.


ConventIonal monItorInG RO on an industrial scale uses banks of membranes connected in parallel to maximise the volume of water being purified. The water quality is monitored using various methods, depending on the needs to the manufacturing process. The most common arrangement is the use of differential pressure sensors on either side of the membranes as well as conductivity measurements being taken on the ‘pure’ water side. The difference between inlet and outlet pressures will change as the filter becomes blocked with impurities. System alarms can be configured to alert maintenance staff that the filter needs to be cleaned. Water that has passed through the RO system, known as the permeate, should have a very low conductivity reading and this can be checked by manually removing samples and testing them in the on-site lab. However, depending on the number of samples being taken each day, this can be a time-consuming exercise. Regular sampling and testing will clearly deliver a


more accurate picture of the water quality and pick up an anomaly more quickly. Better still, an automated process that is capable of sampling multiple lines consistently and providing alarm signals as soon as a membrane breach is detected can be used.


BreWery Improvements As fluid control experts, Bürkert has developed a specialist permeate monitoring system for just this purpose. The advantages are best explained by examining a real-world example. A beer and cider manufacturer that relies on


boreholes for its source of process water was using a conventional RO system with 45m3


of water


required per hour. Most RO systems will have a conductivity sensor on the common outlet, but these can struggle to detect small impurities that may arise from damage to a single membrane. With only a very limited storage capacity, the volume


of production water from the RO system needed to keep up with the manufacturing processes. This meant that downtime had to be kept to an absolute minimum. The brewery had found that certain membranes could foul up quicker than others. Conductivity levels could be seen to slowly increase as one filter became blocked and this was quickly followed by several others causing the conductivity level to increase rapidly. As soon as several filters became blocked, the RO system had to be stopped and repaired as quickly as possible. If this could be achieved while the buffer of stored water is used, then no production capacity was


36 August 2020 Instrumentation Monthly


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74