search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Feature sponsored by Test & measurement


CONFORMANCE TEST FAILED. WHAT NOW?


By Guido Schulze, product manager oscilloscopes, Rohde & Schwarz


ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS OF SIGNAL INTEGRITY PROBLEMS ON HIGH SPEED DIGITAL BUSES Conformance tests are performed on serial data interfaces such as USB, HDMI and PCI Express to ensure interoperability between electronic devices and accessories. In cases where signal integrity problems are encountered, the R&S RTP oscilloscope supports root cause analysis by providing powerful tools such as eye diagrams, jitter and noise separation as well as time domain reflectometry.


AUTOMATIC CONFORMANCE TESTS FOR HIGH SPEED DATA INTERFACES Conformance tests represent an important milestone during product development. The relevant standardisation committees have published detailed test specifications for many interfaces such as USB and Ethernet. Specialised test labs offer complete testing services for such interfaces, including documentation and certification. For users who need to perform these tests on their own, the R&S RTP provides automated test solutions for all common interface standards. These solutions are equipped with graphical measurement configuration tools and off-shelf test sequences. No matter how the testing is performed: If results do not comply with the standard, time-consuming debugging is required. During root cause analysis, the R&S


RTP oscilloscope provides support with analysis tools such as eye diagrams with mask tests or separation of jitter and noise components. Time domain reflectometry is also available for verifying the transmission characteristics of passive signal path components such as connectors, cables and signal lines on the printed board.


CONFORMANCE TESTING FOR USB 3.2 TRANSMITTERS USB 3.2 transmitter conformance testing focuses on the eye diagram (transmitted eye) for verifying the eye opening, signal levels and jitter components. This test is performed directly on the device output (short channel) as well as with a simulated signal path (long channel). For long channel tests, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) has


32


Fig. 1: Conformance test for USB 3.2 Gen 1 with the R&S RTP164


oscilloscope (16 GHz).


published files with S-parameters for various cable and signal trace lengths. During the tests, the oscilloscope acquires clock and data signal sequences with a length of 200 μs. These sequences are then checked for compliance with the standard using the SigTest USB-IF analysis software. Depending on the test mode, each USB device must generate the compliance patterns on its own: For USB 3.2 Gen 1, this means patterns CP0 (data) and CP1 (clock) and for USB 3.2 Gen 2, patterns CP9 (data) and CP10 (clock). Switching to the next CP pattern involves sending short LFPS sequences to the receiver in the USB device. The R&S RTP supports conformance


testing for USB 3.2 Gen 1 (13 GHz model required) and for Gen 2 (16 GHz model) (Fig. 1). The SigTest analysis software is integrated into the R&S RTP- K101 USB 3.2 conformance testing option, and the corresponding test sequence is automated. The option provides convenient graphical support to guide the user through the measurement. With the integrated two- channel 100 MHz generator option, switching between the individual test patterns takes place automatically. Simultaneous testing of the short and long channels is another simplification. The trace from the short channel setup is processed using embedding filters generated on the basis of USB-IF S- parameter files to produce a long channel trace (Fig. 2). Complete test results are compiled in a detailed report.


Fig. 2: Acquisition of the “short channel” trace for a USB 3.2 Gen 1


device on channels 1 and 3 with real-time calculation as a differential signal (Diff 1). Calculation of the “long channel” signal through embedding of the S-parameters from the USB-IF (Math 1).


Fig. 3: The USB 3.2 Gen 1 conformance test report reveals abnormally high jitter in the results table (top) and in the eye diagram.


September 2022 Instrumentation Monthly


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82