search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Test & measurement


consistency. In food production, faster washdowns and quicker changeovers give teams the flexibility to run smaller, more frequent batches - improving throughput without increasing risk. Well-designed systems also reduce reliance on chemical detergents and high-water volumes, contributing to sustainability goals and lowering operating costs.


Ultimately, hygienic design supports a leaner, cleaner process - where less time scrubbing means more time producing.


WHEN CRISIS FORCES CHANGE History shows that some of the biggest leaps in hygienic standards were made in the wake of outbreaks. In 2009, the United States faced a major Salmonella incident linked to peanuts. Just two years later, a deadly Listeria outbreak from cantaloupes dominated headlines. In both cases, the equipment in use was not up to the task - hard to clean, poorly maintained and structurally flawed. Similar issues have affected the dairy industry too.


Instrumentation Monthly August 2025


In 2025, frozen supplemental shakes were linked to a deadly Listeria outbreak across 21 states. An FDA investigation found the outbreak strain inside the facility, confirming biological contamination was likely due to problems within the processing environment rather than the raw ingredients. Meanwhile in the pharmaceutical world, contamination inside injectable drugs has led to patient exposure, regulatory shutdowns and serious public scrutiny. These are not isolated events — they are reminders that poor hygienic practices can slip through the cracks, sometimes literally. This is where safety concerns and the fear of biological contamination take over. Poor system design often means that cleaning must be done with extreme measures - using high temperatures, long cycle times, aggressive concentrations and harsh cleaning media - effectively sterilising the system to death. Not only does this require enormous effort, but it also puts additional strain on both equipment and resources. And the cost is not just reputational. According to the Grocery Manufacturers Association, some companies


hit by recalls have reported financial impacts of $99 million or more. Others never fully recover. So, it is no surprise that regulators have tightened their grip. In the US, the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) mandates proactive food safety planning. The FDA recognised the problem very early on and founded the organisation 3A in 1929, whose guidelines and their implementation are mandatory for the dairy industry. In Europe, EHEDG plays a key role in guiding hygienic best practice from factory layout to machine geometry.


WHAT HYGIENIC DESIGN REALLY MEANS Hygienic design is not about overengineering or adding expense - it is about removing friction. Friction in cleaning, in maintenance, in downtime. It is about choosing equipment that is built to be cleaned thoroughly, quickly and repeatedly without damage or degradation.


That translates into smooth, rounded surfaces instead of corners where debris can collect. It means


Continued on page 20... 19


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84