• • • NEWS • • •
A NEW SURVEY FINDS MOST CORPORATE CSR TEAMS DOUBT THEY’LL MEET SUSTAINABILITY GOALS, WITH ONLY 11 PER CENT CONFIDENT THEIR ORGANISATION IS ON TRACK
Confidence in corporate CSR delivery has dropped sharply, according to new data from over 450 sustainability professionals across UK and European companies
T
he True State of Sustainability 2025 report, published by UK sustainability network Leafr, finds that nine in ten corporate sustainability teams doubt their ability to meet short- and long-term sustainability goals. The results point to a widening capacity gap as businesses face new ESG disclosure requirements under the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and UK Green Claims Code.
Delivery risk across major employers: With two-thirds of respondents based in large or enterprise organisations, the findings reflect pressures inside the companies responsible for the majority of corporate emissions and the most demanding disclosure obligations. The data provides a real-time insight into how the UK and Europe’s largest employers are managing sustainability delivery when regulatory expectations are rising and investor scrutiny is intensifying.
Headline findings: – Only 11 per cent of respondents think their organisation is on track to meet its short- and long-term sustainability targets vs 24 per cent in 2024.
– 67 per cent respondents from large or enterprise sized firms.
– 76 per cent reported their team is not adequately resourced.
– 91 per cent said they have been asked to work beyond their formal area of expertise.
– 72 per cent said their remit had expanded. – 67 per cent said team was same or smaller than last year.
– 62 per cent cited budget constraints as key barrier to progress.
– 42 per cent flagged lack of C-Suite engagement, a figure that has doubled since 2024 report.
Quotes from the industry: Mike Barry, Planeatry Alliance, said: “That just 11per cent of respondents feel confident about delivering their long and, particularly concerning, short-term targets (25 per cent in 2024) is sobering. Despite the ESG backlash, many companies have retained their public targets but seem to be soft-pedalling on their delivery. The public holding of the sustainability targets line has been important and should not be underestimated in the current political climate, but the worry grows that the truly transformative action we need to respond to the conjoined and growing social
electricalengieneeringmagazine.co.uk
and environmental crises is still stalled at the start line.” Mary Johnstone-Louis, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, said: “Leafr’s new report is
clear: leaders with a compliance-led approach to sustainability put their companies at risk. In the report’s own words: “What’s needed is not a minor adjustment, but a radical rethink”. Leaders who act on Leafr’s recommendations now will be the ones shaping, not chasing, the future.” Gus Bartholomew, Leafr Co-Founder, said: “The data confirms what we hear from our community every day. Sustainability teams cannot deliver net zero on their own. They are under-resourced, pulled in too many directions, and forced into compliance work at the expense of impact. Unless leadership, regulators, and investors align behind a pragmatic model that values environmental outcomes as much as financial ones, targets will remain out of reach.” Nick Valenzia, Leafr Co-Founder, added: “Boards would never accept financial accounts prepared by unqualified staff, yet they entrust multi-million- pound sustainability strategies to overstretched and under-resourced teams. If we are serious about delivering commitments, resources must match rhetoric.”
www.leafr.com
Gus Bartholomew and Nick Valenzia Co-Founders of Leafr ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING • OCTOBER 2025 5
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52
