search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CABLING & CABLE MANAGEMENT SUPPLEMENT FEATURE


The growing, worldwide emphasis on environmentally-friendly renewable energy sources means large-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) installations are under increasing pressure to generate green energy on an unprecedented scale. Consequently, any disruption can have


widespread logistical, financial and performance-related consequences for plant owners and operators. With this in mind, Ian Gibson, technical director at Flexicon, explains the


importance of specifying appropriate cable protection and the representative test methods for ensuring excellent protection performance


Protecting solar installation cabling from hostile environments


S


olar PV installations are typically subjected to a variety of hazards due to their external


locations, with interconnected cabling typically subjected to prolonged exposure to UV radiation. Throughout the life of the installation, UV radiation will degrade any plastic materials unless consideration has been given to the selected products and materials used during the design and specification. Failure could result in materials cracking, an increase in brittleness, less flexibility and lower impact strength. The levels of UV radiation exposure of the materials, which varies throughout the world, will determine the extent and severity of the potentially damaging effects. Furthermore, UV damage can change the material properties, making them more vulnerable to other environmental factors such as extreme temperatures, impact, crushing, corrosion, abrasions, dust and water ingress, and attack from grazing animals and vermin.


WHOLE LIFE COSTS Yet despite cabling being vital to continuous power and avoiding disruption, cable protection has traditionally been seen as an afterthought. Specifiers often choose the cheapest option available, resulting in a false economy when considering whole life costs. This is a mistake, as prolonged exposure to UV


radiation can result in incorrectly-specified protection systems becoming degraded or damaged, exposing necessary cabling and leading to potential failure. The ensuing, unscheduled downtime caused by equipment breakdown can lead to far-reaching operational issues as solar installations are typically


Xenon arc test UL 1660, carried out by the independent Underwriters Laboratories.


installed in remote or isolated locations and spread across large areas. Consequently, from a practical perspective,


physical fault finding and fixing damaged solar cabling can be, even with the advent of sophisticated remote monitoring technology, quite difficult. Downtime results in lost revenue while remedial work is carried out and contractors are under pressure to get systems back online safely. If owners or operators are working from a payback deal, such disruption can often lead to penalty clauses being invoked.


CORRECT SPECIFICATION As a result, when specifying flexible conduit for solar cabling, UV performance should be prioritised. It is recommended that cabling used in solar applications should be protected in a flexible conduit system to enhance the level of performance over the installation’s lifetime. Taking this into account, many flexible conduit manufacturers quote products to be ‘UV resistant’. However, because there is no one recognised standard that UV resistance is tested to, actual product performance claims can differ drastically from manufacturer to manufacturer. So how do you know how effective or how much UV resistance a product will offer? In fact, some cable protection systems that claim to offer UV resistance may have been designed to offer protection against only occasional UV. Such variation can lead to specifiers and


purchasers selecting incorrect and unsuitable cable protection systems. Flexicon have tested a range of products to provide assurances and confirm that its conduit solutions offer maximum, protection from UV radiation. These products have been subjected to the 1,000 hour





EXTENDED UV TESTING Selected Flexicon products have been exposed to extended testing, enduring over 21,000 hours of Xenon arc testing without failure. To put this into context, this would be equivalent to being subjected to over 21 years in Florida sunshine where UV radiation levels measure between 160 and 180 Kilolangleys. Flexicon products have also provided cable protection against UV radiation for applications in the telecommunications industry for over 10 years in Australia without failure. Developed for the world’s most demanding


environments, Flexicon’s extensive testing and performance simulations provide reassurance of UV performance suitable for the UK, where radiation levels are not as extreme as other parts of the world. Indeed, the company is so confident in its range of solar flexible conduit systems’ ability to survive external applications, it now offers varying warranty periods up to 20 years for specific product ranges from the product’s purchase date.


Designed to protect cables used for Solar PV


installations, this solar product range warranty offers reassurance that Flexicon’s Flexible Conduit will not suffer from significant mechanical deterioration from Ultra Violet exposure for either 20 years or 10 years depending on the product. For example, the FPIH range, which is suited for tracking solar arrays, is covered for 20 years and the FPAS range of conduits is covered for 10 years. www.flexicon.uk.com/en


CABLING & CABLE MANAGEMENT | JUNE 2018 S13


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64